|
Home > Archive > Unix administration > January 2004 > Re: i want to start an application automatically at boot in unix : Please help urgent
You are viewing an archived Text-only version of the thread.
To view this thread in it's original format and/or if you want to reply to
this thread please [click here]
| Author |
Re: i want to start an application automatically at boot in unix : Please help urgent
|
|
| Cameron Laird 2004-01-23, 4:36 pm |
| In article <MGN5b.9619$Lk5.4878@newsread3.news.pas.earthlink.net>,
Alan Connor <alanconnor@earthlink.net> wrote:[QUOTE][color=darkred]
>On 4 Sep 2003 12:48:34 -0700, indian <down_to_planet@hotmail.com> wrote:
| |
| Alan Connor 2004-01-23, 4:36 pm |
| On Thu, 04 Sep 2003 22:27:37 -0000, Cameron Laird <claird@lairds.com> wrote:quote:
>
>
> In article <MGN5b.9619$Lk5.4878@newsread3.news.pas.earthlink.net>,
> Alan Connor <alanconnor@earthlink.net> wrote:
> .
> .
> .
> .
> .
> .
> It's more than that--
Yes, there is more than that. You snipped the second half of my post.
and the difference is what's missingquote:
> from Mr. Pospychala's suggestion elsewhere in this thread:
> init not only launches applications at boot time, but re-
> starts during normal operations instances that happen to
> have died (approximately).
Which is EXACTLY what the OP says he wants.
What I told him works perfectly and I KNOW it does because I do it that way
myself.
Perhaps, since you are so very knowledgable, you could like give the OP
the answer he needs?
Just a thought.
Alan C
--
take control of your mailbox ----- elrav1 ----- http://tinyurl.com/l55a
| |
| Alan Connor 2004-01-23, 4:36 pm |
| On Thu, 04 Sep 2003 22:27:37 -0000, Cameron Laird <claird@lairds.com> wrote:quote:
>
>
> In article <MGN5b.9619$Lk5.4878@newsread3.news.pas.earthlink.net>,
> Alan Connor <alanconnor@earthlink.net> wrote:
> .
> .
> .
> .
> .
> .
> It's more than that--
Yes, there is more than that. You snipped the second half of my post.
and the difference is what's missingquote:
> from Mr. Pospychala's suggestion elsewhere in this thread:
> init not only launches applications at boot time, but re-
> starts during normal operations instances that happen to
> have died (approximately).
Which is EXACTLY what the OP says he wants.
What I told him works perfectly and I KNOW it does because I do it that way
myself.
Perhaps, since you are so very knowledgable, you could like give the OP
the answer he needs?
Just a thought.
Alan C
--
take control of your mailbox ----- elrav1 ----- http://tinyurl.com/l55a
| |
| Alan Connor 2004-01-23, 4:36 pm |
| On Thu, 04 Sep 2003 22:27:37 -0000, Cameron Laird <claird@lairds.com> wrote:quote:
>
>
> In article <MGN5b.9619$Lk5.4878@newsread3.news.pas.earthlink.net>,
> Alan Connor <alanconnor@earthlink.net> wrote:
> .
> .
> .
> .
> .
> .
> It's more than that--and the difference is what's missing
> from Mr. Pospychala's suggestion elsewhere in this thread:
> init not only launches applications at boot time, but re-
> starts during normal operations instances that happen to
> have died (approximately). You definitely want to study
> `man init`.
Well Cameron, I've been reading in man init, and you are very right about
the big picture being more complex than I made it seem in my post.
Never-the-less, I have been using that "recipe" for quite a while, and it
seems to work fine. Perhaps as I read further I will pick up some refinements.
Thanks,
Alan C
--
take control of your mailbox ----- elrav1 ----- http://tinyurl.com/l55a
| |
| Alan Connor 2004-01-23, 4:36 pm |
| On Thu, 04 Sep 2003 22:27:37 -0000, Cameron Laird <claird@lairds.com> wrote:quote:
>
>
> In article <MGN5b.9619$Lk5.4878@newsread3.news.pas.earthlink.net>,
> Alan Connor <alanconnor@earthlink.net> wrote:
> .
> .
> .
> .
> .
> .
> It's more than that--and the difference is what's missing
> from Mr. Pospychala's suggestion elsewhere in this thread:
> init not only launches applications at boot time, but re-
> starts during normal operations instances that happen to
> have died (approximately). You definitely want to study
> `man init`.
Well Cameron, I've been reading in man init, and you are very right about
the big picture being more complex than I made it seem in my post.
Never-the-less, I have been using that "recipe" for quite a while, and it
seems to work fine. Perhaps as I read further I will pick up some refinements.
Thanks,
Alan C
--
take control of your mailbox ----- elrav1 ----- http://tinyurl.com/l55a
| |
| Cameron Laird 2004-01-23, 4:47 pm |
| In article <MGN5b.9619$Lk5.4878@newsread3.news.pas.earthlink.net>,
Alan Connor <alanconnor@earthlink.net> wrote:[QUOTE][color=darkred]
>On 4 Sep 2003 12:48:34 -0700, indian <down_to_planet@hotmail.com> wrote:
| |
| Alan Connor 2004-01-23, 4:47 pm |
| On Thu, 04 Sep 2003 22:27:37 -0000, Cameron Laird <claird@lairds.com> wrote:quote:
>
>
> In article <MGN5b.9619$Lk5.4878@newsread3.news.pas.earthlink.net>,
> Alan Connor <alanconnor@earthlink.net> wrote:
> .
> .
> .
> .
> .
> .
> It's more than that--
Yes, there is more than that. You snipped the second half of my post.
and the difference is what's missingquote:
> from Mr. Pospychala's suggestion elsewhere in this thread:
> init not only launches applications at boot time, but re-
> starts during normal operations instances that happen to
> have died (approximately).
Which is EXACTLY what the OP says he wants.
What I told him works perfectly and I KNOW it does because I do it that way
myself.
Perhaps, since you are so very knowledgable, you could like give the OP
the answer he needs?
Just a thought.
Alan C
--
take control of your mailbox ----- elrav1 ----- http://tinyurl.com/l55a
| |
| Alan Connor 2004-01-23, 4:47 pm |
| On Thu, 04 Sep 2003 22:27:37 -0000, Cameron Laird <claird@lairds.com> wrote:quote:
>
>
> In article <MGN5b.9619$Lk5.4878@newsread3.news.pas.earthlink.net>,
> Alan Connor <alanconnor@earthlink.net> wrote:
> .
> .
> .
> .
> .
> .
> It's more than that--and the difference is what's missing
> from Mr. Pospychala's suggestion elsewhere in this thread:
> init not only launches applications at boot time, but re-
> starts during normal operations instances that happen to
> have died (approximately). You definitely want to study
> `man init`.
Well Cameron, I've been reading in man init, and you are very right about
the big picture being more complex than I made it seem in my post.
Never-the-less, I have been using that "recipe" for quite a while, and it
seems to work fine. Perhaps as I read further I will pick up some refinements.
Thanks,
Alan C
--
take control of your mailbox ----- elrav1 ----- http://tinyurl.com/l55a
| |
| Cameron Laird 2004-01-23, 5:01 pm |
| In article <MGN5b.9619$Lk5.4878@newsread3.news.pas.earthlink.net>,
Alan Connor <alanconnor@earthlink.net> wrote:[QUOTE][color=darkred]
>On 4 Sep 2003 12:48:34 -0700, indian <down_to_planet@hotmail.com> wrote:
| |
| Alan Connor 2004-01-23, 5:01 pm |
| On Thu, 04 Sep 2003 22:27:37 -0000, Cameron Laird <claird@lairds.com> wrote:quote:
>
>
> In article <MGN5b.9619$Lk5.4878@newsread3.news.pas.earthlink.net>,
> Alan Connor <alanconnor@earthlink.net> wrote:
> .
> .
> .
> .
> .
> .
> It's more than that--
Yes, there is more than that. You snipped the second half of my post.
and the difference is what's missingquote:
> from Mr. Pospychala's suggestion elsewhere in this thread:
> init not only launches applications at boot time, but re-
> starts during normal operations instances that happen to
> have died (approximately).
Which is EXACTLY what the OP says he wants.
What I told him works perfectly and I KNOW it does because I do it that way
myself.
Perhaps, since you are so very knowledgable, you could like give the OP
the answer he needs?
Just a thought.
Alan C
--
take control of your mailbox ----- elrav1 ----- http://tinyurl.com/l55a
| |
| Alan Connor 2004-01-23, 5:01 pm |
| On Thu, 04 Sep 2003 22:27:37 -0000, Cameron Laird <claird@lairds.com> wrote:quote:
>
>
> In article <MGN5b.9619$Lk5.4878@newsread3.news.pas.earthlink.net>,
> Alan Connor <alanconnor@earthlink.net> wrote:
> .
> .
> .
> .
> .
> .
> It's more than that--and the difference is what's missing
> from Mr. Pospychala's suggestion elsewhere in this thread:
> init not only launches applications at boot time, but re-
> starts during normal operations instances that happen to
> have died (approximately). You definitely want to study
> `man init`.
Well Cameron, I've been reading in man init, and you are very right about
the big picture being more complex than I made it seem in my post.
Never-the-less, I have been using that "recipe" for quite a while, and it
seems to work fine. Perhaps as I read further I will pick up some refinements.
Thanks,
Alan C
--
take control of your mailbox ----- elrav1 ----- http://tinyurl.com/l55a
|
|
|
|
|