Unix administration - Re: Server Architecture [OT] (was: Server Architecture)

This is Interesting: Free IT Magazines  
Home > Archive > Unix administration > August 2004 > Re: Server Architecture [OT] (was: Server Architecture)





You are viewing an archived Text-only version of the thread. To view this thread in it's original format and/or if you want to reply to this thread please [click here]

Author Re: Server Architecture [OT] (was: Server Architecture)
yls177

2004-08-22, 6:08 pm

Adam Price <adam+usenet@pappnase.co.uk> wrote in message news:<1pyt93d5o3de$.dlg@pappnase.co.uk>...
> On 19 Aug 2004 20:45:19 -0700, yls177 wrote:
>
> No they aren't. You need to go and understand performance and the servers
> you describe before you realise how wrong this question is.
>
> An alpha server could be anything from an old slow workstation class
> machine to a Top500 supercomputer.
> A blade server could contain 'Intel ia-32' processors, IA-64 processors
> PA-Risc processors..
> A proliant server would contain Intel ia-32 processors and could be a blade
> server or not.
> A superdome is an computer sytem from HP which could contain IA-64 or
> PA-Risc processors.
> And so on...
> Go talk to HP, they can sell you any of these servers and will be able to
> explain the differences.
>
>
>
> Without being rude, the scale of your ignorance is too huge for a unix
> administration newsgroup, this thread is off topic here.
> Adam



cheers.. you are right.. my ignorance is too huge. I am trying to
understand these different models. And not forgetting i still have
SUN, and IBM servers too...
Sponsored Links






Free braindumps | Software forum | Database administration forum

Copyright 2003 - 2008 webservertalk.com