Unix administration - proc: table is full

This is Interesting: Free IT Magazines  
Home > Archive > Unix administration > December 2006 > proc: table is full





You are viewing an archived Text-only version of the thread. To view this thread in it's original format and/or if you want to reply to this thread please [click here]

Author proc: table is full
p002842@yahoo.fr

2006-12-18, 7:22 am

Hi all,

Why the proc table is full ? Any idea to resolv ? Any experience about
this Pb ?

# uname -a
HP-UX adler B.11.23 U ia64 4175670235 unlimited-user license

# grep full /var/adm/messages
proc: table is full
....

# /usr/sbin/sysdef | grep nproc
nproc 4200 - 10-
-
# /usr/sbin/sysdef | grep ninode
ninode 35648 - 14-
-
# /usr/sbin/sysdef | grep nfile
nfile 65536 - 14-
-

# uptime
10:46am up 28 days, 21:17, 90 users, load average: 0.10, 0.11, 0.13
# w | wc -l
92

# top
System: adler Mon Dec 18
10:47:21 2006
Load averages: 0.08, 0.10, 0.12
541 processes: 514 sleeping, 24 running, 3 zombies
Cpu states:
CPU LOAD USER NICE SYS IDLE BLOCK SWAIT INTR SSYS
0 0.08 0.0% 0.0% 3.0% 97.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
1 0.08 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
2 0.08 0.0% 0.0% 2.0% 98.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
3 0.08 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
--- ---- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
avg 0.08 0.0% 0.0% 1.0% 99.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%

Memory: 5625340K (1761248K) real, 6735408K (2157012K) virtual, 2926960K
free Page# 1/42

Juha Laiho

2006-12-20, 1:18 pm

p002842@yahoo.fr said:
>Why the proc table is full ? Any idea to resolv ? Any experience about
>this Pb ?
>
># uname -a
>HP-UX adler B.11.23 U ia64 4175670235 unlimited-user license
>
># grep full /var/adm/messages
>proc: table is full
>...
>
># /usr/sbin/sysdef | grep nproc
>nproc 4200 - 10-


Well, at some point in the history your machine had 4200 processes running.
You might be able to find at least some idea of when this happened by
looking at timestamps of other messages around that one in the messages
file.

># top
>System: adler Mon Dec 18
>10:47:21 2006
>Load averages: 0.08, 0.10, 0.12
>541 processes: 514 sleeping, 24 running, 3 zombies


.... but by now it looks like there are only 541.

There's nothing connecting the information frmo 'top' to something that
happened at some earlier point in time.
--
Wolf a.k.a. Juha Laiho Espoo, Finland
(GC 3.0) GIT d- s+: a C++ ULSH++++$ P++@ L+++ E- W+$@ N++ !K w !O !M V
PS(+) PE Y+ PGP(+) t- 5 !X R !tv b+ !DI D G e+ h---- r+++ y++++
"...cancel my subscription to the resurrection!" (Jim Morrison)
Doug Freyburger

2006-12-20, 1:18 pm

Juha Laiho wrote:
> p002842@yahoo.fr said:
>
>
>
> Well, at some point in the history your machine had 4200 processes running.


I remember encountering this problem several years ago on HPUX
when few processes were running. There are other tables involved
and this message confused me for a while.

Also look into the shared memory table and the semaphore table.
I think one of those filled not the process table. One way to get
this problem is to run a database without doing the required kernel
tuning settings.

Sponsored Links






Free braindumps | Software forum | Database administration forum

Copyright 2003 - 2008 webservertalk.com