Unix administration - Data center outsourcing-(REF: IT/UNIX)-Cost Saving...

Author

Data center outsourcing-(REF: IT/UNIX)-Cost Saving...

offshore.mgmt@gmail.com

2007-09-11, 1:18 pm

Hello,

This message is for the US,and Europe company and its data center.

I am a solaris system administrator with having knowledge of the
Storage and Veritas , also experience on shell scripts..

I live in india. if your company wants to out source system
administration and also want to save money than pl. outsource to me.

if you want to be monitored during your night time , we can do it from
here

if you are interested than pl . write on : offshore.mgmt@gmail.com

With regards,
KN,

Offshore Management-India.

Dave Hinz

2007-09-11, 7:19 pm

On Tue, 11 Sep 2007 06:45:16 -0700, offshore.mgmt@gmail.com <offshore.mgmt@gmail.com> wrote:

> I live in india. if your company wants to out source system
> administration and also want to save money than pl. outsource to me.

Sorry, I don't deal with spammers. But thank you for warning me to
avoid you as one, I would have hated to do business with you by mistake.

Here's a hint for you: this is a group for sysadmins to talk to each
other, not for spammers to exploit as a free advertizing forum.

David McKenzie

2007-09-13, 1:19 am

offshore.mgmt@gmail.com wrote:
> Hello,
>
> This message is for the US,and Europe company and its data center.
>
> I am a solaris system administrator with having knowledge of the
> Storage and Veritas , also experience on shell scripts..
>
> I live in india. if your company wants to out source system
> administration and also want to save money than pl. outsource to me.
>
> if you want to be monitored during your night time , we can do it from
> here
>
> if you are interested than pl . write on : offshore.mgmt@gmail.com
>
> With regards,
> KN,
>
> Offshore Management-India.
>
Stop stealing our jobs.

--
DM davidm@cia.com.au

'It would go against respecting principles and truth if you have to
respect and accept anything just because it is the other side's view.'
- Kim Jung Ill

steves67756@hotmail.com

2007-09-14, 7:22 pm

On 11 Sep 2007 23:50:33 GMT, Dave Hinz <DaveHinz@gmail.com> wrote:

>On Tue, 11 Sep 2007 06:45:16 -0700, offshore.mgmt@gmail.com <offshore.mgmt@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>Sorry, I don't deal with spammers

Blah, blah, blah. STFU. You don't get to decide what is posted here
regardless of what you think.

Michael Vilain

2007-09-14, 7:22 pm

In article <18bp8s.84o.17.1@news.alt.net>, steves67756@hotmail.com
wrote:

> On 11 Sep 2007 23:50:33 GMT, Dave Hinz <DaveHinz@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> Blah, blah, blah. STFU. You don't get to decide what is posted here
> regardless of what you think.

It's not wise to post job listings in UNIX groups. For the most part,
the very people who would be candidates or might hire from the offending
firm almost universally don't like it. Which would lead to the
candidates represented by the firm having their resumes shitcanned and
the firm being blacklisted company-wide.

And actually, we _do_ get to decide what gets posted here. Not by any
banning policy or stuff you see in on-line forums. News groups have
been around a lllllooooonnnnnnggggggg time (I think google has
references to articles I posted in the early 1990s). Most groups decide
what they allow or don't allow and then flame the poster or complain the
posting ISP.

Dave's been here quite a while. This is the first I've ever seen of you.

--
DeeDee, don't press that button! DeeDee! NO! Dee...

Robert Melson

2007-09-15, 1:38 am

In article <18bp8s.84o.17.1@news.alt.net>,
steves67756@hotmail.com writes:
> On 11 Sep 2007 23:50:33 GMT, Dave Hinz <DaveHinz@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> Blah, blah, blah. STFU. You don't get to decide what is posted here
> regardless of what you think.

Got a chip on your shoulder, eh?

As another poster has said, the group actually does have the
right to decide what's posted here and, in general, jobs
postings, solicitations of work for hire, and other topics
for which there are other, more appropriate newsgroups, are
frowned on.

Same's true for abusive or ill-informed postings coming from
folks like you.

I won't say it's been a pleasure meeting you, so ...

<plonk!>

--
Robert G. Melson | Rio Grande MicroSolutions | El Paso, Texas
-----
"People unfit for freedom---who cannot do much with it---are
hungry for power." ---Eric Hoffer

Dave Hinz

2007-09-15, 1:38 am

On Fri, 14 Sep 2007 18:59:00 -0400, steves67756@hotmail.com <steves67756@hotmail.com> wrote:
> On 11 Sep 2007 23:50:33 GMT, Dave Hinz <DaveHinz@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> Blah, blah, blah. STFU. You don't get to decide what is posted here
> regardless of what you think.

You're right, I wasn't around when the charter was written for this
group. Were you? Look at it this way - if a headhunter is willing to
violate the decades old social inertia of "don't spam techie groups with
jobs spam", what other conventions is he going to violate? Would you
trust them to, for instance, not call your current boss and ask for a
reference? Would you trust them to not send your resume somewhere
without checking with you first? There's tons of good headhunters out
there, why would you deal with someone who shows the first sign of
either ignorance or willful violation of conventions?

Did you have anything to contribute on the topic of Unix systems
administration, by the way? I seem to have missed it.

steves67756@hotmail.com

2007-09-16, 1:31 am

On Fri, 14 Sep 2007 17:13:23 -0700, Michael Vilain <vilain@spamcop.net>
wrote:

>In article <18bp8s.84o.17.1@news.alt.net>, steves67756@hotmail.com
>wrote:
>
>
>It's not wise to post job listings in UNIX groups. For the most part,
>the very people who would be candidates or might hire from the offending
>firm almost universally don't like it. Which would lead to the
>candidates represented by the firm having their resumes shitcanned and
>the firm being blacklisted company-wide.
>
>And actually, we _do_ get to decide what gets posted here.

No, actually you don't.

>Dave's been here quite a while. This is the first I've ever seen of you.

Yes, he has been whining for here for some.