Unix Programming - Re: .so v/s .dll

This is Interesting: Free IT Magazines  
Home > Archive > Unix Programming > October 2004 > Re: .so v/s .dll





You are viewing an archived Text-only version of the thread. To view this thread in it's original format and/or if you want to reply to this thread please [click here]

Author Re: .so v/s .dll
Paul Pluzhnikov

2004-10-19, 2:48 am

opwv_pspl_test2@yahoo.com (K.M Jr) writes:

> UNIX DSOs == Dynamic Shared object Library, right ?


Right.

> Those that need dlopen(), dlsym().


No, you don't need to use dlopen() in order to use DSOs any more
then you need to use LoadLibrary() in order to use DLLs.

> So do we likewise need any switch for a UNIX DSOs so one can release
> memory allocated by the DSO ?


No, it works on UNIX without any special switches (which is the
point Chuck Dillon was trying to make, I think).

Cheers,
--
In order to understand recursion you must first understand recursion.
Remove /-nsp/ for email.
Sponsored Links






Free braindumps | Software forum | Database administration forum

Copyright 2003 - 2008 webservertalk.com