Unix Programming - Re: SPAM

Author

Re: SPAM

Webmaster

2004-10-21, 5:56 pm

In article <cl9a3v$1ri$1@grandcanyon.binc.net>
Chuck Dillon <spam@nimblegen.com> wrote:
>
> Jim Brock wrote:
>
> By what definition? I can think of two definitions for spam. 1)
> multiple posting of off-topic information to an unnecessarily large set
> of unrelated forums. 2) Unsoliticed email.
>
> He's done neither. He provided a valid, and potentially useful,
> response to a request (i.e. solicited) for information.
>
>
> You can't be serious, ROTFLMAO...
>
> You've got your own definition of morality as well as spam it appears.
>

Yawn.