Unix Programming - Re: chmod: Why must "g+s" be specified symbolically (at least in

This is Interesting: Free IT Magazines

Home > Archive > Unix Programming > October 2004 > Re: chmod: Why must "g+s" be specified symbolically (at least in

You are viewing an archived Text-only version of the thread. To view this thread in it's original format and/or if you want to reply to this thread please [click here]

Author

Re: chmod: Why must "g+s" be specified symbolically (at least in

Steve Graegert

2004-10-22, 5:53 pm

Dave Uhring wrote:
> On Sat, 23 Oct 2004 00:02:14 +0200, Steve Graegert wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
> The OP is discussing directories, not files.
>

Oops! My fault. Just didn't get it.

\Steve