Unix Programming - Re: Whats the practical maximum file size using indexed allocation

This is Interesting: Free IT Magazines  
Home > Archive > Unix Programming > February 2006 > Re: Whats the practical maximum file size using indexed allocation





You are viewing an archived Text-only version of the thread. To view this thread in it's original format and/or if you want to reply to this thread please [click here]

Author Re: Whats the practical maximum file size using indexed allocation
Henry Townsend

2006-02-28, 7:51 am

Maxim S. Shatskih wrote:
>
> Yes.


Yes but it must be added, the question itself seems to reveal a lack of
understanding. True, Unix (what's a *NIX anyway?) directory entries have
this limitation but that's like saying potatoes will fall if you drop
them from a tower - yes, and so will anything else. All directory
entries, Unix or not, are inherently limited to references within their
own filesystem, just as pointers in a program cannot point into another
program's address space and a table in a relational database cannot
contain data from another database. These are not quirks of
implementation; they are requirements of reality.

And BTW, in the Unix world at least, the terms "volume", "partition",
"drive", and "filesystem" refer to potentially divergent things.
Directory entries can point only within their _filesystem_; the volume
is something else again.
Sponsored Links






Free braindumps | Software forum | Database administration forum

Copyright 2003 - 2008 webservertalk.com