Unix Shell - Re: portability

This is Interesting: Free IT Magazines  
Home > Archive > Unix Shell > November 2005 > Re: portability





You are viewing an archived Text-only version of the thread. To view this thread in it's original format and/or if you want to reply to this thread please [click here]

Author Re: portability
Geoff Clare

2005-11-29, 5:58 pm

Sven Mascheck <cus.p.mascheck@spamgourmet.com> wrote, on Tue, 29 Nov 2005:

> - Linux, FreeBSD-/Net-/OpenBSD don't have a "subshell optimizing"
> shell available per default.


It depends what "per default" means for Linux, but for some Linux
distro's that might not be entirely true. On Debian systems (and
presumably other distro's based on Debian) you can "apt-get install ksh"
to install ksh93, you don't have to get it from www.kornshell.com.

--
Geoff Clare <netnews@gclare.org.uk>

Sponsored Links






Free braindumps | Software forum | Database administration forum

Copyright 2003 - 2008 webservertalk.com