|
Home > Archive > Red Hat General > January 2004 > initlog: error while loading
You are viewing an archived Text-only version of the thread.
To view this thread in it's original format and/or if you want to reply to
this thread please [click here]
| Author |
initlog: error while loading
|
|
|
| Hi There,
I am a newbie to Linux, but is trying to learn and in that procees I ran
into following problem, can somebody help me.
I am getting this information "initlog: error while loading shared librarie:
libpopt.so.0" when booting my redhat 8.0, after installation of Gcc + Glibc.
my machine stops and I only have possibility to log into some kind of
recovery command line. "repair filesystem" I have tried to run e2fsck -c
and -p but it did not help.
:-) Michael
| |
| P.T. Breuer 2004-01-23, 7:10 pm |
| In linux.redhat.misc Mic <Michael132_spam@barnby.dk> wrote:quote:
> I am getting this information "initlog: error while loading shared librarie:
> libpopt.so.0" when booting my redhat 8.0, after installation of Gcc + Glibc.
WHAT ARE YOU DOING REPLACING GLIBC!!!!!!! ARRRAGGHHH! Are you crazy?
quote:
> my machine stops and I only have possibility to log into some kind of
> recovery command line. "repair filesystem" I have tried to run e2fsck -c
> and -p but it did not help.
Well, don't "replace" libc then. Your system is now effectively ruined for
you. You can't "replace" the fundamental library on which the rest of the
system depends and expect to live!
I would guess you have made a well-documented "architecture error", and
installed a different arch libc (although a valid minor upgrade number)
to your present one. That is a hole. Read the RH pages about this
predicament and do what they say to do.
Peter
| |
| Vwakes 2004-01-23, 7:10 pm |
| On Sun, 9 Nov 2003 P.T. Breuer wrote:quote:
>In linux.redhat.misc Mic <Michael132_spam@barnby.dk> wrote:
>
>WHAT ARE YOU DOING REPLACING GLIBC!!!!!!! ARRRAGGHHH! Are you crazy?
>
>
>Well, don't "replace" libc then. Your system is now effectively ruined
>for you. You can't "replace" the fundamental library on which the rest
>of the system depends and expect to live!
>
>I would guess you have made a well-documented "architecture error", and
>installed a different arch libc (although a valid minor upgrade number)
>to your present one. That is a hole. Read the RH pages about this
>predicament and do what they say to do.
Read this bug report too. It gives lot of useful ways on how to deal
with this mess:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzill...ug.cgi?id=88456
Post if you get stuck anywhere.
GL
V.
|
|
|
|
|