Red Hat Networking - samba with NetBIOS rather than TCP/IP

Author

samba with NetBIOS rather than TCP/IP

Johnny Ventura

2004-01-23, 7:37 pm

Can samba work with NetBIOS, rather than TCP/IP? If so, how?

matt

2004-01-23, 7:37 pm

"Andrew McLaren" <andrewmclaren@bigpond.n0-s-p-a-m.com> wrote in message
news:Xns93DDDCB118FE4andrewmclaren@210.49.20.254...

quote:

> Johnny Ventura wrote:
>
>
> Sorry, the question makes no sense.
>
> NetBIOS is a programming API to enable various session and presentation
> layer services. It is not, in and of itself, a network protocol.
>
> Samba implements a CIFS server. CIFS (aka SMB) already uses NetBIOS over
> TCP/IP.
>
> The name "NetBIOS" is sometimes used, in IBM circles, to describe the
> network protocol otherwise known as NetBEUI. NetBEUI is a simple protocol
> and rather unfeatured - no routing, no hierarchical name space, very

little

quote:

> load-balancing or failover etc .... you don't want to use NetBEUI!!

But you might, if part of your network (purely for experimental reasons) is
a Tandy 1000 running the old ms lanman client that can only handle netbeui
on an 8088 (TCP/IP requires a 286). I had this working nicely with windows
98, but have been wondering if there is any way to get linux to speak
netbeui. I'm expecting the answer to be no!

matt

quote:

>
> Cheers
> Andrew

---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.516 / Virus Database: 313 - Release Date: 01/09/2003

matt

2004-01-23, 7:37 pm

"Andrew McLaren" <andrewmclaren@bigpond.n0-s-p-a-m.com> wrote in message
news:Xns93DDDCB118FE4andrewmclaren@210.49.20.254...

quote:

> Johnny Ventura wrote:
>
>
> Sorry, the question makes no sense.
>
> NetBIOS is a programming API to enable various session and presentation
> layer services. It is not, in and of itself, a network protocol.
>
> Samba implements a CIFS server. CIFS (aka SMB) already uses NetBIOS over
> TCP/IP.
>
> The name "NetBIOS" is sometimes used, in IBM circles, to describe the
> network protocol otherwise known as NetBEUI. NetBEUI is a simple protocol
> and rather unfeatured - no routing, no hierarchical name space, very

little

quote:

> load-balancing or failover etc .... you don't want to use NetBEUI!!

quote:

>
> Cheers
> Andrew

---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.516 / Virus Database: 313 - Release Date: 01/09/2003

matt

2004-01-23, 7:37 pm

"Andrew McLaren" <andrewmclaren@bigpond.n0-s-p-a-m.com> wrote in message
news:Xns93DDDCB118FE4andrewmclaren@210.49.20.254...

quote:

> Johnny Ventura wrote:
>
>
> Sorry, the question makes no sense.
>
> NetBIOS is a programming API to enable various session and presentation
> layer services. It is not, in and of itself, a network protocol.
>
> Samba implements a CIFS server. CIFS (aka SMB) already uses NetBIOS over
> TCP/IP.
>
> The name "NetBIOS" is sometimes used, in IBM circles, to describe the
> network protocol otherwise known as NetBEUI. NetBEUI is a simple protocol
> and rather unfeatured - no routing, no hierarchical name space, very

little

quote:

> load-balancing or failover etc .... you don't want to use NetBEUI!!

quote:

>
> Cheers
> Andrew

---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.516 / Virus Database: 313 - Release Date: 01/09/2003

matt

2004-01-23, 7:37 pm

"Andrew McLaren" <andrewmclaren@bigpond.n0-s-p-a-m.com> wrote in message
news:Xns93DDDCB118FE4andrewmclaren@210.49.20.254...

quote:

> Johnny Ventura wrote:
>
>
> Sorry, the question makes no sense.
>
> NetBIOS is a programming API to enable various session and presentation
> layer services. It is not, in and of itself, a network protocol.
>
> Samba implements a CIFS server. CIFS (aka SMB) already uses NetBIOS over
> TCP/IP.
>
> The name "NetBIOS" is sometimes used, in IBM circles, to describe the
> network protocol otherwise known as NetBEUI. NetBEUI is a simple protocol
> and rather unfeatured - no routing, no hierarchical name space, very

little

quote:

> load-balancing or failover etc .... you don't want to use NetBEUI!!

quote:

>
> Cheers
> Andrew

---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.516 / Virus Database: 313 - Release Date: 01/09/2003

spacepatrol

2004-01-23, 7:37 pm

"matt" <matt-removethis-@fire-flash.net> wrote in
news:Ncj7b.208$lj5.140134@newsfep2-win.server.ntli.net:

quote:

> Path:
> sn-us!sn-xit-01!sn-xit-08!supernews.com!news-out.visi.com!petbe.visi.co
> m!news-out1.nntp.be!propagator2-sterling!news-in-sterling.newsfeed.com!
> pd2nf1so.cg.shawcable.net!residential.shaw.ca!news1.calgary.shaw.ca.POS
> TED!not-for-mail X-Trace-PostClient-IP: 24.68.196.98
> From: "Stephen" <private@private.ca>
> Subject: Re: Newbie networking question
> User-Agent: Pan/0.13.3 (That cat's something I can't explain)
> Message-Id: <pan.2003.09.09.04.02.10.30315@private.ca>
> Newsgroups: redhat.networking.general
> References: <Xns93F0AF13FDB14spacepatrol@127.0.0.1>
> <pan.2003.09.09.03.06.20.159726@private.ca> MIME-Version: 1.0
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
> Lines: 32
> Date: Tue, 09 Sep 2003 04:02:11 GMT
> NNTP-Posting-Host: 24.64.223.206
> X-Complaints-To: abuse@shaw.ca
> X-Trace: news1.calgary.shaw.ca 1063080131 24.64.223.206 (Mon, 08 Sep
> 2003 22:02:11 MDT) NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 08 Sep 2003 22:02:11 MDT
> Organization: Shaw Residential Internet
> Xref: sn-us redhat.networking.general:10961
>
> spacepatrol,
>
> the setup I described in the other thread works after rebooting both
> machines.
>
>
>
> On Tue, 09 Sep 2003 03:06:20 +0000, Stephen wrote:
>
>

Thank you! I will study that and give it a try.

spacepatrol

2004-01-23, 7:37 pm

"matt" <matt-removethis-@fire-flash.net> wrote in
news:Ncj7b.208$lj5.140134@newsfep2-win.server.ntli.net:

quote:

> Path:
> sn-us!sn-xit-01!sn-xit-08!supernews.com!news-out.visi.com!petbe.visi.co
> m!news-out1.nntp.be!propagator2-sterling!news-in-sterling.newsfeed.com!
> pd2nf1so.cg.shawcable.net!residential.shaw.ca!news1.calgary.shaw.ca.POS
> TED!not-for-mail X-Trace-PostClient-IP: 24.68.196.98
> From: "Stephen" <private@private.ca>
> Subject: Re: Newbie networking question
> User-Agent: Pan/0.13.3 (That cat's something I can't explain)
> Message-Id: <pan.2003.09.09.04.02.10.30315@private.ca>
> Newsgroups: redhat.networking.general
> References: <Xns93F0AF13FDB14spacepatrol@127.0.0.1>
> <pan.2003.09.09.03.06.20.159726@private.ca> MIME-Version: 1.0
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
> Lines: 32
> Date: Tue, 09 Sep 2003 04:02:11 GMT
> NNTP-Posting-Host: 24.64.223.206
> X-Complaints-To: abuse@shaw.ca
> X-Trace: news1.calgary.shaw.ca 1063080131 24.64.223.206 (Mon, 08 Sep
> 2003 22:02:11 MDT) NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 08 Sep 2003 22:02:11 MDT
> Organization: Shaw Residential Internet
> Xref: sn-us redhat.networking.general:10961
>
> spacepatrol,
>
> the setup I described in the other thread works after rebooting both
> machines.
>
>
>
> On Tue, 09 Sep 2003 03:06:20 +0000, Stephen wrote:
>
>

Thank you! I will study that and give it a try.

spacepatrol

2004-01-23, 7:37 pm

"matt" <matt-removethis-@fire-flash.net> wrote in
news:Ncj7b.208$lj5.140134@newsfep2-win.server.ntli.net:

quote:

> Path:
> sn-us!sn-xit-01!sn-xit-08!supernews.com!news-out.visi.com!petbe.visi.co
> m!news-out1.nntp.be!propagator2-sterling!news-in-sterling.newsfeed.com!
> pd2nf1so.cg.shawcable.net!residential.shaw.ca!news1.calgary.shaw.ca.POS
> TED!not-for-mail X-Trace-PostClient-IP: 24.68.196.98
> From: "Stephen" <private@private.ca>
> Subject: Re: Newbie networking question
> User-Agent: Pan/0.13.3 (That cat's something I can't explain)
> Message-Id: <pan.2003.09.09.04.02.10.30315@private.ca>
> Newsgroups: redhat.networking.general
> References: <Xns93F0AF13FDB14spacepatrol@127.0.0.1>
> <pan.2003.09.09.03.06.20.159726@private.ca> MIME-Version: 1.0
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
> Lines: 32
> Date: Tue, 09 Sep 2003 04:02:11 GMT
> NNTP-Posting-Host: 24.64.223.206
> X-Complaints-To: abuse@shaw.ca
> X-Trace: news1.calgary.shaw.ca 1063080131 24.64.223.206 (Mon, 08 Sep
> 2003 22:02:11 MDT) NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 08 Sep 2003 22:02:11 MDT
> Organization: Shaw Residential Internet
> Xref: sn-us redhat.networking.general:10961
>
> spacepatrol,
>
> the setup I described in the other thread works after rebooting both
> machines.
>
>
>
> On Tue, 09 Sep 2003 03:06:20 +0000, Stephen wrote:
>
>

Thank you! I will study that and give it a try.

spacepatrol

2004-01-23, 7:37 pm

"matt" <matt-removethis-@fire-flash.net> wrote in
news:Ncj7b.208$lj5.140134@newsfep2-win.server.ntli.net:

quote:

> Path:
> sn-us!sn-xit-01!sn-xit-08!supernews.com!news-out.visi.com!petbe.visi.co
> m!news-out1.nntp.be!propagator2-sterling!news-in-sterling.newsfeed.com!
> pd2nf1so.cg.shawcable.net!residential.shaw.ca!news1.calgary.shaw.ca.POS
> TED!not-for-mail X-Trace-PostClient-IP: 24.68.196.98
> From: "Stephen" <private@private.ca>
> Subject: Re: Newbie networking question
> User-Agent: Pan/0.13.3 (That cat's something I can't explain)
> Message-Id: <pan.2003.09.09.04.02.10.30315@private.ca>
> Newsgroups: redhat.networking.general
> References: <Xns93F0AF13FDB14spacepatrol@127.0.0.1>
> <pan.2003.09.09.03.06.20.159726@private.ca> MIME-Version: 1.0
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
> Lines: 32
> Date: Tue, 09 Sep 2003 04:02:11 GMT
> NNTP-Posting-Host: 24.64.223.206
> X-Complaints-To: abuse@shaw.ca
> X-Trace: news1.calgary.shaw.ca 1063080131 24.64.223.206 (Mon, 08 Sep
> 2003 22:02:11 MDT) NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 08 Sep 2003 22:02:11 MDT
> Organization: Shaw Residential Internet
> Xref: sn-us redhat.networking.general:10961
>
> spacepatrol,
>
> the setup I described in the other thread works after rebooting both
> machines.
>
>
>
> On Tue, 09 Sep 2003 03:06:20 +0000, Stephen wrote:
>
>

Thank you! I will study that and give it a try.

Andrew McLaren

2004-01-23, 7:37 pm

Johnny Ventura wrote:

quote:

> Can samba work with NetBIOS, rather than TCP/IP? If so, how?

Sorry, the question makes no sense.

NetBIOS is a programming API to enable various session and presentation
layer services. It is not, in and of itself, a network protocol.

Samba implements a CIFS server. CIFS (aka SMB) already uses NetBIOS over
TCP/IP.

The name "NetBIOS" is sometimes used, in IBM circles, to describe the
network protocol otherwise known as NetBEUI. NetBEUI is a simple protocol
and rather unfeatured - no routing, no hierarchical name space, very little
load-balancing or failover etc .... you don't want to use NetBEUI!!

Cheers
Andrew

Jerome Fenal

2004-01-23, 7:37 pm

matt wrote:

quote:

> "Andrew McLaren" <andrewmclaren@bigpond.n0-s-p-a-m.com> wrote in message
> news:Xns93DDDCB118FE4andrewmclaren@210.49.20.254...

snip

quote:

> But you might, if part of your network (purely for experimental reasons) is
> a Tandy 1000 running the old ms lanman client that can only handle netbeui
> on an 8088 (TCP/IP requires a 286). I had this working nicely with windows
> 98, but have been wondering if there is any way to get linux to speak
> netbeui. I'm expecting the answer to be no!
>

Have a look at http://zhubr.tamb.ru/samba/ (not tested personaly).

Regards,

Jerome

Jerome Fenal

2004-01-23, 7:37 pm

matt wrote:

quote:

> "Andrew McLaren" <andrewmclaren@bigpond.n0-s-p-a-m.com> wrote in message
> news:Xns93DDDCB118FE4andrewmclaren@210.49.20.254...

snip

quote:

> But you might, if part of your network (purely for experimental reasons) is
> a Tandy 1000 running the old ms lanman client that can only handle netbeui
> on an 8088 (TCP/IP requires a 286). I had this working nicely with windows
> 98, but have been wondering if there is any way to get linux to speak
> netbeui. I'm expecting the answer to be no!
>

Have a look at http://zhubr.tamb.ru/samba/ (not tested personaly).

Regards,

Jerome

Jerome Fenal

2004-01-23, 7:37 pm

matt wrote:

quote:

> "Andrew McLaren" <andrewmclaren@bigpond.n0-s-p-a-m.com> wrote in message
> news:Xns93DDDCB118FE4andrewmclaren@210.49.20.254...

snip

quote:

> But you might, if part of your network (purely for experimental reasons) is
> a Tandy 1000 running the old ms lanman client that can only handle netbeui
> on an 8088 (TCP/IP requires a 286). I had this working nicely with windows
> 98, but have been wondering if there is any way to get linux to speak
> netbeui. I'm expecting the answer to be no!
>

Have a look at http://zhubr.tamb.ru/samba/ (not tested personaly).

Regards,

Jerome

matt

2004-01-23, 7:37 pm

"Jerome Fenal" <jfenalml@free.fr> wrote in message
news:bjo3u9$kpg$2@news-reader4.wanadoo.fr...

quote:

> matt wrote:
>
> snip
is[QUOTE][color=darkred]
netbeui[QUOTE][color=darkred]
windows[QUOTE][color=darkred]
> Have a look at http://zhubr.tamb.ru/samba/ (not tested personaly).

Looks like that will go some way towards doing the job!!

many thanks,
matt

quote:

>
> Regards,
>
> Jerome
>

--
matthew fullerton
RH Linux 9 kernel-2.4.20-19.9. on K6-2-500 with Samba 2.2.7a
This message was posted using Outlook Express 6 (sorry)
greatbigblackhole@hotmail.com is a real address, but don't expect anything
(SPAM or otherwise) to get read

---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.516 / Virus Database: 313 - Release Date: 01/09/2003

Jerome Fenal

2004-01-23, 7:37 pm

matt wrote:

quote:

> "Andrew McLaren" <andrewmclaren@bigpond.n0-s-p-a-m.com> wrote in message
> news:Xns93DDDCB118FE4andrewmclaren@210.49.20.254...

snip

quote:

> But you might, if part of your network (purely for experimental reasons) is
> a Tandy 1000 running the old ms lanman client that can only handle netbeui
> on an 8088 (TCP/IP requires a 286). I had this working nicely with windows
> 98, but have been wondering if there is any way to get linux to speak
> netbeui. I'm expecting the answer to be no!
>

Have a look at http://zhubr.tamb.ru/samba/ (not tested personaly).

Regards,

Jerome

matt

2004-01-23, 7:37 pm

"Jerome Fenal" <jfenalml@free.fr> wrote in message
news:bjo3u9$kpg$2@news-reader4.wanadoo.fr...

quote:

> matt wrote:
>
> snip
is[QUOTE][color=darkred]
netbeui[QUOTE][color=darkred]
windows[QUOTE][color=darkred]
> Have a look at http://zhubr.tamb.ru/samba/ (not tested personaly).

Looks like that will go some way towards doing the job!!

many thanks,
matt

quote:

>
> Regards,
>
> Jerome
>

matt

2004-01-23, 7:37 pm

"Jerome Fenal" <jfenalml@free.fr> wrote in message
news:bjo3u9$kpg$2@news-reader4.wanadoo.fr...

quote:

> matt wrote:
>
> snip
is[QUOTE][color=darkred]
netbeui[QUOTE][color=darkred]
windows[QUOTE][color=darkred]
> Have a look at http://zhubr.tamb.ru/samba/ (not tested personaly).

Looks like that will go some way towards doing the job!!

many thanks,
matt

quote:

>
> Regards,
>
> Jerome
>

matt

2004-01-23, 7:37 pm

"Jerome Fenal" <jfenalml@free.fr> wrote in message
news:bjo3u9$kpg$2@news-reader4.wanadoo.fr...

quote:

> matt wrote:
>
> snip
is[QUOTE][color=darkred]
netbeui[QUOTE][color=darkred]
windows[QUOTE][color=darkred]
> Have a look at http://zhubr.tamb.ru/samba/ (not tested personaly).

Looks like that will go some way towards doing the job!!

many thanks,
matt

quote:

>
> Regards,
>
> Jerome
>

Johnny Ventura

2004-01-23, 7:37 pm

To clarify:

My Windows XT Home Edition machines only use the following protocol for file
and print sharing:

"NWLink IPX/SPX/NetBIOS Compatible Transport Protocol". That is its exact
name as specified in windows.

My question is whether samba can recognize this protocol? If so, how?

(There are no bindings to TCP/IP)

"Andrew McLaren" <andrewmclaren@bigpond.n0-s-p-a-m.com> wrote in message
news:Xns93DDDCB118FE4andrewmclaren@210.49.20.254...

quote:

> Johnny Ventura wrote:
>
>
> Sorry, the question makes no sense.
>
> NetBIOS is a programming API to enable various session and presentation
> layer services. It is not, in and of itself, a network protocol.
>
> Samba implements a CIFS server. CIFS (aka SMB) already uses NetBIOS over
> TCP/IP.
>
> The name "NetBIOS" is sometimes used, in IBM circles, to describe the
> network protocol otherwise known as NetBEUI. NetBEUI is a simple protocol
> and rather unfeatured - no routing, no hierarchical name space, very

little

quote:

> load-balancing or failover etc .... you don't want to use NetBEUI!!
>
> Cheers
> Andrew

Andrew McLaren

2004-01-23, 7:37 pm

Johnny Ventura wrote:

quote:

> To clarify:
>
> My Windows XT Home Edition machines only use the following protocol
> for file and print sharing:
>
> "NWLink IPX/SPX/NetBIOS Compatible Transport Protocol". That is its
> exact name as specified in windows.
>
> My question is whether samba can recognize this protocol? If so, how?
>
> (There are no bindings to TCP/IP)

NWLink is Microsoft's clone of the IPX/SPX protocol once used by Novell
Netware. Once upon a time, IPX was a common protocol on corporate LANs.
These days, it has been replaced by TCP/IP; even at sites which still run
Netware Servers (except for a few Netware 3.11 hold-outs).

Samba is a TCP/IP application. It uses TCP/IP to communicate with clients.
Samba cannot communicate using IPX/SPX.

Since Sockets can be used for both TCP/IP and IPX, you could - in theory -
adapt Samba to use IPX; but there's no point.

XP uses TCP/IP by default. I guess you must have replaced it with IPX at
some stage. For practical purposes, your best bet would be to install
TCP/IP instead of IPX on your XP box and just use TCP/IP. TCP/IP is by far
the most universal linga franca of networking; and with good reason - it is
superior to IPX, DECNet, SNA and other deceased protocls of the past.

Cheers
Andrew

matt

2004-01-23, 7:37 pm

"Andrew McLaren" <andrewmclaren@bigpond.n0-s-p-a-m.com> wrote in message
news:Xns93DDDCB118FE4andrewmclaren@210.49.20.254...

quote:

> Johnny Ventura wrote:
>
>
> Sorry, the question makes no sense.
>
> NetBIOS is a programming API to enable various session and presentation
> layer services. It is not, in and of itself, a network protocol.
>
> Samba implements a CIFS server. CIFS (aka SMB) already uses NetBIOS over
> TCP/IP.
>
> The name "NetBIOS" is sometimes used, in IBM circles, to describe the
> network protocol otherwise known as NetBEUI. NetBEUI is a simple protocol
> and rather unfeatured - no routing, no hierarchical name space, very

little

quote:

> load-balancing or failover etc .... you don't want to use NetBEUI!!

quote:

>
> Cheers
> Andrew

---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.516 / Virus Database: 313 - Release Date: 01/09/2003

spacepatrol

2004-01-23, 7:37 pm

"matt" <matt-removethis-@fire-flash.net> wrote in
news:Ncj7b.208$lj5.140134@newsfep2-win.server.ntli.net:

quote:

> Path:
> sn-us!sn-xit-01!sn-xit-08!supernews.com!news-out.visi.com!petbe.visi.co
> m!news-out1.nntp.be!propagator2-sterling!news-in-sterling.newsfeed.com!
> pd2nf1so.cg.shawcable.net!residential.shaw.ca!news1.calgary.shaw.ca.POS
> TED!not-for-mail X-Trace-PostClient-IP: 24.68.196.98
> From: "Stephen" <private@private.ca>
> Subject: Re: Newbie networking question
> User-Agent: Pan/0.13.3 (That cat's something I can't explain)
> Message-Id: <pan.2003.09.09.04.02.10.30315@private.ca>
> Newsgroups: redhat.networking.general
> References: <Xns93F0AF13FDB14spacepatrol@127.0.0.1>
> <pan.2003.09.09.03.06.20.159726@private.ca> MIME-Version: 1.0
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
> Lines: 32
> Date: Tue, 09 Sep 2003 04:02:11 GMT
> NNTP-Posting-Host: 24.64.223.206
> X-Complaints-To: abuse@shaw.ca
> X-Trace: news1.calgary.shaw.ca 1063080131 24.64.223.206 (Mon, 08 Sep
> 2003 22:02:11 MDT) NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 08 Sep 2003 22:02:11 MDT
> Organization: Shaw Residential Internet
> Xref: sn-us redhat.networking.general:10961
>
> spacepatrol,
>
> the setup I described in the other thread works after rebooting both
> machines.
>
>
>
> On Tue, 09 Sep 2003 03:06:20 +0000, Stephen wrote:
>
>

Thank you! I will study that and give it a try.

Jerome Fenal

2004-01-23, 7:37 pm

matt wrote:

quote:

> "Andrew McLaren" <andrewmclaren@bigpond.n0-s-p-a-m.com> wrote in message
> news:Xns93DDDCB118FE4andrewmclaren@210.49.20.254...

snip

quote:

> But you might, if part of your network (purely for experimental reasons) is
> a Tandy 1000 running the old ms lanman client that can only handle netbeui
> on an 8088 (TCP/IP requires a 286). I had this working nicely with windows
> 98, but have been wondering if there is any way to get linux to speak
> netbeui. I'm expecting the answer to be no!
>

Have a look at http://zhubr.tamb.ru/samba/ (not tested personaly).

Regards,

Jerome

matt

2004-01-23, 7:37 pm

"Jerome Fenal" <jfenalml@free.fr> wrote in message
news:bjo3u9$kpg$2@news-reader4.wanadoo.fr...

quote:

> matt wrote:
>
> snip
is[QUOTE][color=darkred]
netbeui[QUOTE][color=darkred]
windows[QUOTE][color=darkred]
> Have a look at http://zhubr.tamb.ru/samba/ (not tested personaly).

Looks like that will go some way towards doing the job!!

many thanks,
matt

quote:

>
> Regards,
>
> Jerome
>