|
Home > Archive > Red Hat Networking > March 2004 > route
You are viewing an archived Text-only version of the thread.
To view this thread in it's original format and/or if you want to reply to
this thread please [click here]
|
|
| Ian Butcher 2004-03-08, 10:34 am |
| Hello,
I installed Fedora Core 1, and when I used /sbin/route as root I get:
Kernel IP routing table
Destination Gateway Genmask Flags Metric Ref Use Iface
192.168.45.0 * 255.255.255.0 U 0 0 0 eth0
169.245.0.0 * 255.255.0.0 U 0 0 0 eth0
127.0.0.0 * 255.0.0.0 U 0 0 0 lo
default 192.168.45.7 0.0.0.0 UG 0 0 0 eth0
I know 192.168.45.0 is the local area network, 127.0.0.0 is the
loopback interface, and 192.168.45.7 is the gateway. But how did the
169.245.0.0 address get in there? I didn't enter it. I tried to erase it
with route del 169.245.0.0 and route del -net 169.245.0.0 but it is not
being deleted. Does any one know how it got there, and how I can erase it?
Thanks,
Ian
| |
| Alexander Dalloz 2004-03-08, 11:35 am |
| On Mon, 08 Mar 2004 15:31:16 +0000 Ian Butcher wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I installed Fedora Core 1, and when I used /sbin/route as root I get:
>
> Kernel IP routing table
> Destination Gateway Genmask Flags Metric Ref Use Iface
> 192.168.45.0 * 255.255.255.0 U 0 0 0 eth0
> 169.245.0.0 * 255.255.0.0 U 0 0 0 eth0
> 127.0.0.0 * 255.0.0.0 U 0 0 0 lo
> default 192.168.45.7 0.0.0.0 UG 0 0 0 eth0
>
>
> I know 192.168.45.0 is the local area network, 127.0.0.0 is the
> loopback interface, and 192.168.45.7 is the gateway. But how did the
> 169.245.0.0 address get in there? I didn't enter it. I tried to erase it
> with route del 169.245.0.0 and route del -net 169.245.0.0 but it is not
> being deleted. Does any one know how it got there, and how I can erase it?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Ian
Set NOZEROCONF=yes in /etc/sysconfig/network.
Alexander
--
Alexander Dalloz | Enger, Germany
PGP key valid: made 13.07.1999
PGP fingerprint: 2307 88FD 2D41 038E 7416 14CD E197 6E88 ED69 5653
| |
| Ian Butcher 2004-03-08, 2:35 pm |
| Hello,
Thanks Alexander! That worked. I still don't know how that entry got in
there. Next project is getting Samba working as I did in Redhat 6.2 .
Thanks,
Ian
| |
| Alexander Dalloz 2004-03-08, 5:35 pm |
| On Mon, 08 Mar 2004 18:58:30 +0000 Ian Butcher wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Thanks Alexander! That worked. I still don't know how that entry got in
> there. Next project is getting Samba working as I did in Redhat 6.2 .
This routing entry is there by default, as long as you do not deactivate
it using NOZEROCONF. See /sbin/ifup which sets it up.
> Thanks,
>
> Ian
Alexander
--
Alexander Dalloz | Enger, Germany
PGP key valid: made 13.07.1999
PGP fingerprint: 2307 88FD 2D41 038E 7416 14CD E197 6E88 ED69 5653
| |
| Jeff Jacobsen 2004-03-18, 1:39 pm |
| Alexander Dalloz wrote:
> On Mon, 08 Mar 2004 15:31:16 +0000 Ian Butcher wrote:
>
>
> Set NOZEROCONF=yes in /etc/sysconfig/network.
>
> Alexander
>
>
any further details about what/why this entry exists would be most
appreciated.
|
|
|
|
|