Red Hat Installation - Viper550 Config Prob.

This is Interesting: Free IT Magazines  
Home > Archive > Red Hat Installation > October 2004 > Viper550 Config Prob.





You are viewing an archived Text-only version of the thread. To view this thread in it's original format and/or if you want to reply to this thread please [click here]

Author Viper550 Config Prob.
JumboShrimps

2004-09-28, 8:28 am

Cannot seem to configure RedHat 9.0 with a 16meg Viper550.
When I did the install, the chance to test the graphical interface never
happend,
went straight to the make the boot disk option.
Good thing I picked the text logon I guess.

When I instantiate X, the log file sez
"Fatal server error:
no screens found."

There is no XConfigurator in RH9, so I need to modify the XF86Config file
I would think.
Does anyone have a XF86Config file for the Viper 550 I could cut-and-paste?




Lenard

2004-09-28, 5:56 pm

On Tue, 28 Sep 2004 10:23:14 -0400, JumboShrimps wrote:

> Cannot seem to configure RedHat 9.0 with a 16meg Viper550. When I did
> the install, the chance to test the graphical interface never happend,
> went straight to the make the boot disk option. Good thing I picked the
> text logon I guess.
>
> When I instantiate X, the log file sez "Fatal server error: no screens
> found."
>
> There is no XConfigurator in RH9, so I need to modify the XF86Config
> file I would think.
> Does anyone have a XF86Config file for the Viper 550 I could
> cut-and-paste?


Visit; http://www.nvidia.com/object/linux_...2_1.0-6111.html

See the text README (link at site above) for more detailed instructions
before starting.

Hint: From the console (as root) type something like; wget
http://download.nvidia.com/XFree86/...0-6111-pkg1.run

all one one line with a space after wget and before http


--
Hi! I'm a .sig virus! Please copy me to your .sig! so I can spread
This E-mail is safe, no Microsoft products were used in creating me!

JumboShrimps

2004-09-29, 8:09 pm

Did download the file, ran "sh NVIDIA-Linux-x86-1.0-6111-pkg1.run"
got an error "saying source kernel files were not loaded,
nvidia.o could not load".

OK fine.

Grabbed the RH9.0 CD, mounted it,
did "rpm -ivh kernel-source-2.4.20-8.i386"
no errors upon unpacking.

Tried to install NVIDIA-Linux-x86-1.0-6111-pkg1.run again
- same error in the same part of the process.

Did a "rpm -qv kernel-source-2.4.20-8.i386"
Message said it was NOT loaded BUT
rpm -ivh kernel-source-2.4.20-8.i386 responds with a message
saying it can't be installed because it already IS installed.
Which is it?

"Lenard" <lenard@127.0.0.1> wrote in message
news:pan.2004.09.28.15.27.18.872042@127.0.0.1...
> On Tue, 28 Sep 2004 10:23:14 -0400, JumboShrimps wrote:
>
>
> Visit; http://www.nvidia.com/object/linux_...2_1.0-6111.html
>
> See the text README (link at site above) for more detailed instructions
> before starting.
>
> Hint: From the console (as root) type something like; wget
>

http://download.nvidia.com/XFree86/...Linux-x86-1.0-6
111-pkg1.run
>
> all one one line with a space after wget and before http
>
>
> --
> Hi! I'm a .sig virus! Please copy me to your .sig! so I can spread
> This E-mail is safe, no Microsoft products were used in creating me!
>



Lenard

2004-09-30, 10:46 am

On Wed, 29 Sep 2004 20:39:26 -0400, JumboShrimps wrote:

> Did download the file, ran "sh NVIDIA-Linux-x86-1.0-6111-pkg1.run" got
> an error "saying source kernel files were not loaded, nvidia.o could not
> load".
>
> OK fine.
>
> Grabbed the RH9.0 CD, mounted it,
> did "rpm -ivh kernel-source-2.4.20-8.i386" no errors upon unpacking.
>
> Tried to install NVIDIA-Linux-x86-1.0-6111-pkg1.run again - same error
> in the same part of the process.
>
> Did a "rpm -qv kernel-source-2.4.20-8.i386" Message said it was NOT
> loaded


To be expected, the kernel-source package will not be in the RPM database
normally. Verify that the /usr/src/linux-2.4.20-8 directory exists and
contains sub-directories and files.


> BUT
> rpm -ivh kernel-source-2.4.20-8.i386 responds with a message saying it
> can't be installed because it already IS installed. Which is it?


Yep, to be expected, see above.


--
Hi! I'm a .sig virus! Please copy me to your .sig! so I can spread
This E-mail is safe, no Microsoft products were used in creating me!

JumboShrimps

2004-10-02, 9:11 pm

I will check that, but if the files don't exist in
/usr/src/linux-2.4.20-8, what do I do?

"Lenard" <lenard@127.0.0.1> wrote in message
news:pan.2004.09.30.04.06.15.433301@127.0.0.1...
> On Wed, 29 Sep 2004 20:39:26 -0400, JumboShrimps wrote:
>
>
> To be expected, the kernel-source package will not be in the RPM database
> normally. Verify that the /usr/src/linux-2.4.20-8 directory exists and
> contains sub-directories and files.
>
>
>
> Yep, to be expected, see above.
>
>
> --
> Hi! I'm a .sig virus! Please copy me to your .sig! so I can spread
> This E-mail is safe, no Microsoft products were used in creating me!
>



Sponsored Links






Free braindumps | Software forum | Database administration forum

Copyright 2003 - 2008 webservertalk.com