| Author |
Terminology issue: application maping versus script mapping
|
|
| judyc [msft] 2005-11-21, 5:53 pm |
| I'm a writer on the IIS UE team. We're having a discussion about which term
is preferred/most accurate: application mapping or script mapping.
We want to make things absolutely clear in our documentation. Any thoughts
you have are most appreciated!
Thank you.
| |
|
| having been a long time friend/user of IIS, I prefer 'script mapping'.
Application pool in IIS 6 might confuse people with application mapping.
"judyc [msft]" wrote:
> I'm a writer on the IIS UE team. We're having a discussion about which term
> is preferred/most accurate: application mapping or script mapping.
>
> We want to make things absolutely clear in our documentation. Any thoughts
> you have are most appreciated!
> Thank you.
| |
| JudyC [MSFT] 2005-11-29, 5:58 pm |
| Mike, thanks for your response. We tend to agree that "script mapping" is
more suitable--and because there haven't been any more posts to this thread,
we'll probably go with that.
--
JudyC
IIS UE
"Mike" wrote:
[vbcol=seagreen]
> having been a long time friend/user of IIS, I prefer 'script mapping'.
> Application pool in IIS 6 might confuse people with application mapping.
>
> "judyc [msft]" wrote:
>
|
|
|
|