IIS Server Security - Load balance behind Cisco content switch yields 401 errors

This is Interesting: Free IT Magazines  
Home > Archive > IIS Server Security > January 2004 > Load balance behind Cisco content switch yields 401 errors





You are viewing an archived Text-only version of the thread. To view this thread in it's original format and/or if you want to reply to this thread please [click here]

Author Load balance behind Cisco content switch yields 401 errors
Kevin

2004-01-24, 2:01 am

Situation:
2 servers, ksovetapp001 ksovetapp002
We're load balancing between them with a cisco content switch with DNS
name CCXAPP. When we access pages anonymously, it works fine. If we
access pages requiring authentication (integrated is set) we get:

2004-01-21 14:50:30 10.x.x.16 GET
/GentivaSecurityWebService/userauthenticati
on.asmx - 80 - 10.170.20.20
Mozilla/4.0+compatible;+MSIE+6.0;+Windows+NT+5.1;+.
NET+CLR+1.1.4322) 401 2 2148074254

I've registered the alias name on both servers both fully qualified
and simple using setspn.

If we access the authenticated page via either of the true server
names it works fine.

Any ideas as to a solution would be greatly appreciated!
Kevin

2004-01-24, 2:02 am

Sorry, left off OS the details. Windows server 2003, current on
patches. Windows XP clients, current patches.

kgould@yahoo.com (Kevin) wrote in message news:<8cbed34d.0401210656.74c9112f@posting.google.com>...
quote:

> Situation:
> 2 servers, ksovetapp001 ksovetapp002
> We're load balancing between them with a cisco content switch with DNS
> name CCXAPP. When we access pages anonymously, it works fine. If we
> access pages requiring authentication (integrated is set) we get:
>
> 2004-01-21 14:50:30 10.x.x.16 GET
> /GentivaSecurityWebService/userauthenticati
> on.asmx - 80 - 10.170.20.20
> Mozilla/4.0+compatible;+MSIE+6.0;+Windows+NT+5.1;+.
> NET+CLR+1.1.4322) 401 2 2148074254
>
> I've registered the alias name on both servers both fully qualified
> and simple using setspn.
>
> If we access the authenticated page via either of the true server
> names it works fine.
>
> Any ideas as to a solution would be greatly appreciated!


Sponsored Links






Free braindumps | Software forum | Database administration forum

Copyright 2003 - 2008 webservertalk.com