|
Home > Archive > IIS and SMTP > January 2004 > Unusual Delivery Failure Notifications
You are viewing an archived Text-only version of the thread.
To view this thread in it's original format and/or if you want to reply to
this thread please [click here]
| Author |
Unusual Delivery Failure Notifications
|
|
| Jim P. Barber 2004-01-24, 2:04 am |
| Hi,
I have an iis 5 smtp server that is relaying mail on our
dmz.
The server works well for the most part however I am
getting these strange delivery failures for valid
addresses like below:
This is an automatically generated Delivery Status
Notification.
Unable to deliver message to the following recipients, due
to being unable to connect successfully to the destination
mail server.
validuser+AEA-validdomain.net
-- NextPart --
Unknown MIME type: message/delivery-status
Now I did reduce these by adding my FQDN to both the
Masquerade domain and the FQDN fields of the advanced
options on the delivery tab for the server.
However I am still getting these failures. Any Ideas
would be appreciated.
Jim Barber
| |
| =?Utf-8?B?VG9ueSBTdQ==?= 2004-01-24, 2:05 am |
| Blacklisted?
Using a dynamic IP so a reverse lookup fails?
Tony Su
| |
| Jim P. Barber 2004-01-24, 2:05 am |
| Nope, I have a static IP assigned to the server w/valid
dns mx records. It has got to be some kind of
misconfiguration, but I am having trouble tracking it down.
quote:
>-----Original Message-----
>Blacklisted?
>Using a dynamic IP so a reverse lookup fails?
>
>Tony Su
>.
>
| |
| Matt Keener 2004-01-24, 2:05 am |
| I had (am having still, perhaps) a similar problem. Does
this server have multiple NICs? If so, move the Internet-
facing NIC to the top of the binding order (this worked
for me) (Q296893). Also check to see if you have any 3rd
party programs binding to port 25 with their own self-
contained SMTP server (eg anti-virus programs)
(Q322023)... you may have problems with SMTP socket
pooling.quote:
>-----Original Message-----
>Nope, I have a static IP assigned to the server w/valid
>dns mx records. It has got to be some kind of
>misconfiguration, but I am having trouble tracking it
down.quote:
>
>.
>
|
|
|
|
|