|
Home > Archive > IIS Index Server > May 2006 > Differences in IS between Win2K and Win2K3
You are viewing an archived Text-only version of the thread.
To view this thread in it's original format and/or if you want to reply to
this thread please [click here]
| Author |
Differences in IS between Win2K and Win2K3
|
|
| Kurt Greiner 2006-05-05, 7:18 pm |
| Are there any significant improvements in the Index Server that is part of
Windows 2000 and the one in Windows 2003?
I am interested in things like query language improvements, performance
improvements, more relavent result sets returned, and any other general
differences.
Disappointingly, MSDN leads me to believe they are the same Index Server in
both 2000 and 2003, that there are no improvements.
Can anyone confirm either way from personal use and experience with both?
Kurt G.
| |
| Hilary Cotter 2006-05-08, 1:15 pm |
| It is my understanding that there were only bug fixes in Windows 2003.
Nothing major engine or query wise.
--
Hilary Cotter
Director of Text Mining and Database Strategy
RelevantNOISE.Com - Dedicated to mining blogs for business intelligence.
This posting is my own and doesn't necessarily represent RelevantNoise's
positions, strategies or opinions.
Looking for a SQL Server replication book?
http://www.nwsu.com/0974973602.html
Looking for a FAQ on Indexing Services/SQL FTS
http://www.indexserverfaq.com
"Kurt Greiner" <usenet@krgreiner.com> wrote in message
news:JgO6g.19$SD5.5@fe11.lga...
> Are there any significant improvements in the Index Server that is part of
> Windows 2000 and the one in Windows 2003?
>
> I am interested in things like query language improvements, performance
> improvements, more relavent result sets returned, and any other general
> differences.
>
> Disappointingly, MSDN leads me to believe they are the same Index Server
> in both 2000 and 2003, that there are no improvements.
>
> Can anyone confirm either way from personal use and experience with both?
>
> Kurt G.
>
|
|
|
|
|