|
Home > Archive > Microsoft Content Management Server > August 2004 > Clean URLs Code
You are viewing an archived Text-only version of the thread.
To view this thread in it's original format and/or if you want to reply to
this thread please [click here]
|
|
| Paul Devenney 2004-08-27, 6:07 pm |
| Hi,
I've been using the code that Stefan recommended for "no javascript"
situations (removing the Mac conditions), found at
http://blogs.msdn.com/stefan_gossne.../29/122527.aspx
However there are occasional situations where posting back on the page
causes "dirty" content to appear. For example, say a page provided a search,
you click search, get some results and then click "new search" (all
postbacks on the one page). The resultant page still contains parts of the
previous one.
It appears that the buffer seems to keep dirty information - though it seems
alright when I look at the "content" variable
Has anyone else come across this?
Stefan?
cheers,
Paul
| |
| Stefan [MSFT] 2004-08-27, 6:07 pm |
| Hi Paul,
are you using the Connector for SharePoint Technologies controls?
I haven't tested with them.
Cheers,
Stefan.
--
This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights.
MCMS FAQ:
http://download.microsoft.com/downl...6a/MCMS+2002+-+(complete)+FAQ.htm
MCMS Blog: http://blogs.msdn.com/stefan_gossner/category/4983.aspx
MCMS Sample Code:
http://www.gotdotnet.com/community/...t+S
erver
MCMS Whitepapers and other docs:
http://blogs.msdn.com/stefan_gossne...2/07/41859.aspx
--------------------------------
"Paul Devenney" <paul.devenney@spamgohere.com> wrote in message
news:#0O6ah0iEHA.2340@TK2MSFTNGP11.phx.gbl...
> Hi,
>
> I've been using the code that Stefan recommended for "no javascript"
> situations (removing the Mac conditions), found at
>
> http://blogs.msdn.com/stefan_gossne.../29/122527.aspx
>
> However there are occasional situations where posting back on the page
> causes "dirty" content to appear. For example, say a page provided a
search,
> you click search, get some results and then click "new search" (all
> postbacks on the one page). The resultant page still contains parts of the
> previous one.
>
> It appears that the buffer seems to keep dirty information - though it
seems
> alright when I look at the "content" variable
>
> Has anyone else come across this?
>
> Stefan?
>
> cheers,
>
> Paul
>
>
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|