|
Home > Archive > Microsoft Content Management Server > July 2005 > ascx pages, best practice?
You are viewing an archived Text-only version of the thread.
To view this thread in it's original format and/or if you want to reply to
this thread please [click here]
| Author |
ascx pages, best practice?
|
|
|
| Hi,
In my effort to make my pages as light as possible, i have a few questions.
I was wondering if it would be better to use header/footer ascx files or,
to use custom controls. Or are there any other way of handling the site wide
menu and title structure.
If anyone could help me with the less bandwidth consuming technique, I would
really appreciate it.
Thanks
Dee
| |
| Stefan [MSFT] 2005-07-28, 5:53 pm |
| Hi Dee,
what is the difference between a header/footer ascx and a custom control?
Cheers,
Stefan
--
This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights
New to MCMS?
Check out this book: Building Websites Using MCMS: http://tinyurl.com/6zj44
----------------------
"Dee" <Dee@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:51BF6A36-2C41-4CCE-94F5-30E12AD5B86C@microsoft.com...
> Hi,
> In my effort to make my pages as light as possible, i have a few
> questions.
>
> I was wondering if it would be better to use header/footer ascx files or,
> to use custom controls. Or are there any other way of handling the site
> wide
> menu and title structure.
>
> If anyone could help me with the less bandwidth consuming technique, I
> would
> really appreciate it.
>
> Thanks
> Dee
| |
|
| Hi Stefan,
By header/footer ascx files, I meant to say user controls files with ascx
extension that goes on the top and the bottom of the aspx file. web custom
control is just compiled pieces of control.
I just wanted to find out the industry standard on the page format.
"Stefan [MSFT]" wrote:
> Hi Dee,
>
> what is the difference between a header/footer ascx and a custom control?
>
> Cheers,
> Stefan
>
> --
> This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights
>
> New to MCMS?
> Check out this book: Building Websites Using MCMS: http://tinyurl.com/6zj44
> ----------------------
>
>
> "Dee" <Dee@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
> news:51BF6A36-2C41-4CCE-94F5-30E12AD5B86C@microsoft.com...
>
>
>
| |
|
| I'm not sure there's an "industry standard" with regard to user verses
web control in the context of bandwidth. There may be some impact in
terms of processing time; comparing like-to-like functionality, user
controls may burn slightly more cycles because of how they're
constructed. However, I believe your question is more about the amount
of data downloaded to the client. Given the same functionality and
visual design, you should generally not see significant differences
between the control types.
Shawn
Dee wrote:[vbcol=seagreen]
> Hi Stefan,
> By header/footer ascx files, I meant to say user controls files with ascx
> extension that goes on the top and the bottom of the aspx file. web custom
> control is just compiled pieces of control.
>
> I just wanted to find out the industry standard on the page format.
>
>
> "Stefan [MSFT]" wrote:
>
| |
| Stefan [MSFT] 2005-07-29, 2:48 am |
| Hi Dee,
Shawn is right.
To get more details answers you should post this on an ASP.NET newsgroup as
this is more an ASP.NET related topic.
Cheers,
Stefan
--
This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights
New to MCMS?
Check out this book: Building Websites Using MCMS: http://tinyurl.com/6zj44
----------------------
"Shawn" <shawn_shell@consejoinc.com> wrote in message
news:1122600608.573207.189760@g49g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
> I'm not sure there's an "industry standard" with regard to user verses
> web control in the context of bandwidth. There may be some impact in
> terms of processing time; comparing like-to-like functionality, user
> controls may burn slightly more cycles because of how they're
> constructed. However, I believe your question is more about the amount
> of data downloaded to the client. Given the same functionality and
> visual design, you should generally not see significant differences
> between the control types.
>
> Shawn
>
> Dee wrote:
>
| |
| Stefan [MSFT] 2005-07-29, 8:07 am |
| Hi Dee,
template switching does not influence the performance.
Cheers,
Stefan
--
This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights
New to MCMS?
Check out this book: Building Websites Using MCMS: http://tinyurl.com/6zj44
----------------------
"Dee" <Dee@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:679D32F7-6ACE-4369-A279-E3B767BF9102@microsoft.com...
> Thank you Shwan and Stefan,
> I am also curious about the resource/bandwitdth consumption by
> TemplateSwitching in the CMS. If I should customize the same template to
> display different layout or if I should user TemplateSwitching technology.
>
> thanks
> Dee
| |
|
| Thank you Stefan. It helps me a lot.
|
|
|
|
|