|
Home > Archive > Microsoft Content Management Server > December 2006 > Export/Import of Deleted Items
You are viewing an archived Text-only version of the thread.
To view this thread in it's original format and/or if you want to reply to
this thread please [click here]
| Author |
Export/Import of Deleted Items
|
|
| kckriegs_33@yahoo.com 2006-12-15, 1:17 pm |
| Hi Stefan,
I read the recent posting about deleted resource items. If we are
maintaining Editors/Production sites, and promoting published content
via SDAPI, it sounds like there are manual steps to keep the
environments synchronized?
For instance, if a Resource Manager on the Editors' site deletes an
image from a gallery, SDAPI deployment won't remove it from production,
and an administrator will have to undertake cleanup, correct?
The same would be true if a Template Designer on the Editors' site
deletes a template or template gallery?
Presumably the obsolete items wouldn't hurt anything in production, but
we'd like to keep it "clean".
| |
| Stefan Goßner [MSFT] 2006-12-19, 1:19 pm |
| Hi,
you would need to write a script that exports the list of valid items on the
source server into a text or XML file and then run the script against your
production server and delete all items which are not in the list.
Cheers,
Stefan
<kckriegs_33@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1166198110.092040.208110@l12g2000cwl.googlegroups.com...
> Hi Stefan,
>
> I read the recent posting about deleted resource items. If we are
> maintaining Editors/Production sites, and promoting published content
> via SDAPI, it sounds like there are manual steps to keep the
> environments synchronized?
>
> For instance, if a Resource Manager on the Editors' site deletes an
> image from a gallery, SDAPI deployment won't remove it from production,
> and an administrator will have to undertake cleanup, correct?
>
> The same would be true if a Template Designer on the Editors' site
> deletes a template or template gallery?
>
> Presumably the obsolete items wouldn't hurt anything in production, but
> we'd like to keep it "clean".
>
|
|
|
|
|