|
Home > Archive > Microsoft Content Management Server > March 2007 > Problem with MCMS and KB918899
You are viewing an archived Text-only version of the thread.
To view this thread in it's original format and/or if you want to reply to
this thread please [click here]
| Author |
Problem with MCMS and KB918899
|
|
| Adam Flint 2007-03-21, 7:21 am |
| We have recently installed KB918899 as part of a security roll-out for all
XP machines. We have found that certain pages in MCMS are no longer editable,
the page load gets to a point and then stops. The thing that these specific
pages have in common is that one of the placeholders has a LOT of HTML in it,
e.g. one has 95.2KB of HTML. On the XP machines that have had the patch
applied, the point that the page stops is partway through loading the HTML
parameter for the editable placeholder control that has this large content.
If the patch is removing, the page loads and edits fine.
I read through the KB release notes, and found some items indicating that
calls to ActiveX controls had been tied down. So I was wondering whether
this has had a knock-on effect to editing pages that have large amounts of
HTML.
| |
| Adam Flint 2007-03-21, 1:22 pm |
| Stefan, please ignore this, it's a dupe of what I put in yesterday, I didn't
realise that ureader.com maps onto this forum.
Thanks,
Adam
"Adam Flint" wrote:
> We have recently installed KB918899 as part of a security roll-out for all
> XP machines. We have found that certain pages in MCMS are no longer editable,
> the page load gets to a point and then stops. The thing that these specific
> pages have in common is that one of the placeholders has a LOT of HTML in it,
> e.g. one has 95.2KB of HTML. On the XP machines that have had the patch
> applied, the point that the page stops is partway through loading the HTML
> parameter for the editable placeholder control that has this large content.
> If the patch is removing, the page loads and edits fine.
>
> I read through the KB release notes, and found some items indicating that
> calls to ActiveX controls had been tied down. So I was wondering whether
> this has had a knock-on effect to editing pages that have large amounts of
> HTML.
>
|
|
|
|
|