| Colin Bowern 2006-02-10, 5:51 pm |
| I would also add that CS2002 had that nasty XDR schema in it. CS2006 adds
a much richer standards-based XML integration layer for integration purposes.
As Jeff mentioned BTS2006 really comes of age in terms of out-of-the-box
functionality.
There's a lot more information on BTS2006 on the product group web site:
http://www.microsoft.com/biztalk/default.mspx
One thing that is interesting is the large amount of web casts that they
are pushing out the door pre-RTM:
http://www.microsoft.com/biztalk/te...ng/default.mspx
Cheers,
Colin
[vbcol=seagreen]
> "How much more difficult will it be to use CS2002 and BizTalk2004 for
> this integration?"
>
> It will be more difficult to integrate with your back-end system using
> CS2002 and BTS2004 but it's still very possible. BTS2004 includes a
> SQL Adapter that can be used to "push" or "pull" data from SQL so you
> could use this (along with some well written stored procedures) to
> integrate between CS2002 and your back-end system.
>
> "Does using BT2006 give us much advantage over BT2004?"
>
> BTS2006 is an "evolutionary" upgrade to BTS2004 so the basic features
> are very similar. Where BTS2006 really shines over BTS2004 is in it's
> usability and manageability aspects. BTS2006 also ships with a huge
> number of new adapters to integrate with most major ERP systems.
>
> "sshier" <sshier@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
> news:E12ECFB2-3F92-4A55-9E80-0E98534ED448@microsoft.com...
>
|