FrontPage Server Extensions for Windows - Which FPSE run on Small Business Server 4.5?

Author

Which FPSE run on Small Business Server 4.5?

Andy Winters

2004-08-24, 8:13 am

Good morning,

We are running SBS (NT 4) with IIS 4.0 and our web developer is requesting
we upgrade the FPSE to 2000 or 2002. Will either of these run with our
version of IIS and NT?

If both can run on our server, should we just go with FPSE 2002 because it's
the latest and greatest? Are there known issues that make one a better
choice over the other?

Thank you!

Andy Winters
awinters@xdistributed-energyx.com (remove the x's)

Tom Pepper Willett

2004-08-24, 8:13 am

Will work with IIS4:

FrontPage 2002 Server Extensions Support Center:

http://support.microsoft.com/defaul...fh;en-us;fp10se
----
1) Download FP 2002 Server Extensions:

http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/d...l/fpse02win.asp

2) Download FP2002 Server Extensions Updates (and install in this order):

http://download.microsoft.com/downl...US/fpse1001.exe

http://download.microsoft.com/downl...US/fpse1002.exe

3) Security Patch:

http://support.microsoft.com/defaul...kb;en-us;813380
--
===
Tom "Pepper" Willett
Microsoft MVP - FrontPage
---
About FrontPage 2003:
http://office.microsoft.com/home/of...etid=FX01085802
FrontPage 2003 Product Information:
http://www.microsoft.com/office/fro...fo/default.mspx
Understanding FrontPage:
http://msdn.microsoft.com/office/un...ding/frontpage/
FrontPage 2002 Server Extensions Support Center:
http://support.microsoft.com/defaul...fh;en-us;fp10se
===
"Andy Winters" <awinters@xdistributed-energyx.com> wrote in message
news:OFEXkidiEHA.3016@tk2msftngp13.phx.gbl...
| Good morning,
|
| We are running SBS (NT 4) with IIS 4.0 and our web developer is requesting
| we upgrade the FPSE to 2000 or 2002. Will either of these run with our
| version of IIS and NT?
|
| If both can run on our server, should we just go with FPSE 2002 because
it's
| the latest and greatest? Are there known issues that make one a better
| choice over the other?
|
| Thank you!
|
| Andy Winters
| awinters@xdistributed-energyx.com (remove the x's)
|
|

Hollis D. Paul

2004-08-24, 8:13 am

In article <OFEXkidiEHA.3016@tk2msftngp13.phx.gbl>, Andy Winters wrote:
> If both can run on our server, should we just go with FPSE 2002 because it's
> the latest and greatest? Are there known issues that make one a better
> choice over the other?
>
You should be able to install either. FPSE2K was very stable and had few
problems. Many of the FP MVPs stuck with FPSE2K to avoid all the known
problems with FPSE2K2.

You should only go to FPSE2K2 because you just have to have some of the new
features provided therein--like the picot table, etc. From Office2K3. And be
prepared to install it and all its patches in the proper order.

Here they are, Hollis:
FrontPage 2002 Server Extensions Support Center:

http://support.microsoft.com/defaul...fh;en-us;fp10se
----
1) Download FP 2002 Server Extensions:

http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/d...s/dnservext/htm
l/fpse02win.asp

2) Download FP2002 Server Extensions Updates (and install in this order):

http://download.microsoft.com/downl.../W98NT42KMeXP/E
N-U
S/fpse1001.exe

http://download.microsoft.com/downl.../W98NT42KMeXP/E
N-U
S/fpse1002.exe

3) Security Patch:

http://support.microsoft.com/defaul...kb;en-us;813380
--
===
Tom "Pepper" Willett
Microsoft MVP - FrontPage
---

Hollis D. Paul [MVP - Outlook]
Hollis@outhousebythesound.com
Mukilteo, WA USA

Using Virtual Access 4.52 build 277 (32-bit), Windows 2000 build 2600
http://search.support.microsoft.com...D=TECH&LN=EN-US

Mukilteo, WA USA

Andy Winters

2004-08-24, 6:59 pm

You guys rock!

Thanks for the info!

Andy
=============================
"Andy Winters" <awinters@xdistributed-energyx.com> wrote in message
news:OFEXkidiEHA.3016@tk2msftngp13.phx.gbl...
> Good morning,
>
> We are running SBS (NT 4) with IIS 4.0 and our web developer is requesting
> we upgrade the FPSE to 2000 or 2002. Will either of these run with our
> version of IIS and NT?
>
> If both can run on our server, should we just go with FPSE 2002 because
it's
> the latest and greatest? Are there known issues that make one a better
> choice over the other?
>
> Thank you!
>
> Andy Winters
> awinters@xdistributed-energyx.com (remove the x's)
>
>