|
Home > Archive > FrontPage Server Extensions for Windows > April 2005 > Serious issues publishing to Win 2003 server
You are viewing an archived Text-only version of the thread.
To view this thread in it's original format and/or if you want to reply to
this thread please [click here]
| Author |
Serious issues publishing to Win 2003 server
|
|
| Roy Chastain 2005-04-05, 5:50 pm |
| I just built and installed a Win 2003 Web Edition server
I have about 12 FPSE sites on a Win 2K server that I need to move to the new server. (The my profile does not meet the
requirements of the migration tool, so I decided to 'Publish' the sites from the existing server to the new one.
I created the physical root directories for each virtual server and created and extended the virtual servers.
Of the 12 sites only one has successfully published. The others receive one of two different errors.
"You are not authorized to perform the current operation"
or
An error occurred accessing your SharePoint Services Site. Authors if authoring against a web server please contact the webmaster
for this web servers site. Webmasters please see the servers system log for more details.
(Same error for same site on repeated attempts.)
The server is a member of the domain.
I have extended each virtual server and used the domain administrator password as the Administrator role.
FrontPage solicits me for credentials and then starts to work. It fails after some number of files and it SEEMS to be consistent
for each site as to what file it fails on. However, if I do a single file publish of the failing file, it works. Unfortunately,
this type of operation does not get the navigation and other information updated.
FrontPage is 2003 with current service pack and hot fixes from Office Update
FPSE are from the Win 2003 Server CD (5.0.2.5012)
Server does NOT have SP1 installed. But has all other downloads from Windows Update except for DirectX 9.0c. It also has Windows
SharePoint Services 2.0 SP1 installed.
Thanks
-------------------------------------------
Roy Chastain
KMSystems, Inc.
| |
| Jim Cheshire \(JIMCO\) 2005-04-05, 8:47 pm |
| Roy Chastain wrote:
> The others
> receive one of two different errors.
>
> "You are not authorized to perform the current operation"
> or
> An error occurred accessing your SharePoint Services Site. Authors if
> authoring against a web server please contact the webmaster for this
> web servers site. Webmasters please see the servers system log for
> more details. (Same error for same site on repeated attempts.)
Have you done the above?
--
Jim Cheshire
JIMCO
http://www.jimcoaddins.com
New Spawn Version!
Version 1.9.6 adds new features!
Get it today FREE at:
http://www.jimcoaddins.com
| |
| Roy Chastain 2005-04-06, 2:55 am |
| Well, :Duh, Yes I have, thank you.
And of course there is nothing in the logs.
Please attempt to be helpful next time instead of wasting my time and yours.
On Tue, 5 Apr 2005 19:28:25 -0500, "Jim Cheshire \(JIMCO\)" <contactme@mysite.com> wrote:
>Roy Chastain wrote:
>
>Have you done the above?
-------------------------------------------
Roy Chastain
KMSystems, Inc.
| |
| Jim Cheshire \(JIMCO\) 2005-04-06, 5:54 pm |
| Roy Chastain wrote:[vbcol=seagreen]
> Well, :Duh, Yes I have, thank you.
> And of course there is nothing in the logs.
>
> Please attempt to be helpful next time instead of wasting my time and
> yours.
>
> On Tue, 5 Apr 2005 19:28:25 -0500, "Jim Cheshire \(JIMCO\)"
> <contactme@mysite.com> wrote:
>
If you'll note your original post, you will notice that you didn't say
whether you had or not. Had you indicated whether or not you had, THAT
would have been a good step at preventing wasted time.
It just so happens that I am in a unique position to help you with this
problem, but I must say that I am not inclined to do so after your
discourteous and offensive response.
--
Jim Cheshire
JIMCO
http://www.jimcoaddins.com
New Spawn Version!
Version 1.9.6 adds new features!
Get it today FREE at:
http://www.jimcoaddins.com
| |
| Roy Chastain 2005-04-07, 6:03 pm |
| I do not wish to start a flame war on this, but you should give the people who post credit for little intelligence. Granted I did
not indicate that I had looked, but you might also suspect that I would not have posted a question, if there had been any useful
information or any information gleaned would have been in the post.
And since you claim to know how to fix this, you would already know that there is no information in the logs.
Help me if you wish or not. It is up to you.
On Wed, 6 Apr 2005 09:59:37 -0
500, "Jim Cheshire \(JIMCO\)" <contactme@mysite.com> wrote:
>Roy Chastain wrote:
>
>If you'll note your original post, you will notice that you didn't say
>whether you had or not. Had you indicated whether or not you had, THAT
>would have been a good step at preventing wasted time.
>
>It just so happens that I am in a unique position to help you with this
>problem, but I must say that I am not inclined to do so after your
>discourteous and offensive response.
-------------------------------------------
Roy Chastain
KMSystems, Inc.
| |
| Jim Cheshire \(JIMCO\) 2005-04-07, 6:03 pm |
| Roy Chastain wrote:
> I do not wish to start a flame war on this, but you should give the
> people who post credit for little intelligence. Granted I did not
> indicate that I had looked, but you might also suspect that I would
> not have posted a question, if there had been any useful information
> or any information gleaned would have been in the post.
>
> And since you claim to know how to fix this, you would already know
> that there is no information in the logs.
>
In fact, most people who post with the error you are seeing do NOT check the
event viewer. When we ask them to, they are surprised to get useful
information.
It pays to be courteous, but as you say, it's up to you.
--
Jim Cheshire
JIMCO
http://www.jimcoaddins.com
New Spawn Version!
Version 1.9.6 adds new features!
Get it today FREE at:
http://www.jimcoaddins.com
|
|
|
|
|