| Author |
Does linux still require patched Apache 1.3.19 for FP Extensions?
|
|
| Gary Henry 2005-05-06, 5:57 pm |
| My GNU/linux 2.6.5-1.358 box has Apache 2.0.51. I want to install the Front
Page Server Extensions 2002 on it and the instructions say it requires a
patched Apache 1.3.19. Will this work if I have Apache 2.0.51 installed? I
went ahead and tried to install from the FP50.linux.tar.Z file but cannot
start the httpd daemon now. Here is the error I get:
/usr/sbin/apachectl -f /etc/httpd/conf/httpd.conf
Syntax error on line 155 of /etc/httpd/conf/httpd.conf:
Invalid command 'LoadModule', perhaps mis-spelled or defined by a module not
inc
luded in the server configuration
Is there a fix for this or do I need to install Apache 1.3.19 first?
Thanks,
--
Gary
| |
|
| I believe there is an alternative install script for Apache 2.xxx from
www.rtr.com
You may get better answers posting in
microsoft.public.frontpage.extensions.unix rather than here in
microsoft.public.frontpage.extensions.windowsnt
The faqs at www.rtr.com may also be of some assistance.
--
Ron Symonds
Microsoft MVP (FrontPage)
Reply only to group - emails will be deleted unread.
"Gary Henry" <GaryHenry@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:6D986723-1CFE-4C29-95AF-D43746B8C2BA@microsoft.com...
> My GNU/linux 2.6.5-1.358 box has Apache 2.0.51. I want to install
> the Front
> Page Server Extensions 2002 on it and the instructions say it
> requires a
> patched Apache 1.3.19. Will this work if I have Apache 2.0.51
> installed? I
> went ahead and tried to install from the FP50.linux.tar.Z file but
> cannot
> start the httpd daemon now. Here is the error I get:
>
> /usr/sbin/apachectl -f /etc/httpd/conf/httpd.conf
> Syntax error on line 155 of /etc/httpd/conf/httpd.conf:
> Invalid command 'LoadModule', perhaps mis-spelled or defined by a
> module not
> inc
> luded in the server configuration
>
> Is there a fix for this or do I need to install Apache 1.3.19 first?
>
> Thanks,
> --
> Gary
| |
|
|
|
|