|
Home > Archive > FrontPage Server Extensions for Windows > May 2005 > sharepoint services
You are viewing an archived Text-only version of the thread.
To view this thread in it's original format and/or if you want to reply to
this thread please [click here]
| Author |
sharepoint services
|
|
| waltstime 2005-05-14, 1:16 pm |
| even though I remove the check from the box ToolsPage Options Autorning Share
Point Services, my site gets the error message The web site does not have
share point services installed. The remote web site does have FP 2003
extensions installed.
Any ideas of what is wrong. I have another site on the same host, that had
this problem, until they switched to the correct server, the one that could
handle the FP extensions, this second site is a sudomain of the first.
| |
|
| First, there are no FP2003 extensions - the latest are 2002
extensions.
The error message "No sharepoint services installed" is generic, and
covers both sharepoint and FP extensions.
If the subdomain is a folder within your main site, you must refer to
it as http://example.com/subdomainname when using FP to edit or
publish to it, or the error message will result. FP looks for
information in the root of the destination web, this info. does not
exist in http://subdomainname.example.com, but does exist in
http://example.com.
If you wish to edit/publish to http://subdomain.example.com then
subdomain must be set up as a completely different web site (often
means a different hosting package - depends on host) to the main site.
--
Ron Symonds
Microsoft MVP (FrontPage)
Reply only to group - emails will be deleted unread.
"waltstime" <waltstime@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:EFDBBB64-CC48-4A3B-95D9-ECD2DC69BC86@microsoft.com...
> even though I remove the check from the box ToolsPage Options
> Autorning Share
> Point Services, my site gets the error message The web site does not
> have
> share point services installed. The remote web site does have FP
> 2003
> extensions installed.
>
> Any ideas of what is wrong. I have another site on the same host,
> that had
> this problem, until they switched to the correct server, the one
> that could
> handle the FP extensions, this second site is a sudomain of the
> first.
| |
| sharepoint services 2005-05-14, 1:16 pm |
| Thanks. I will copy and paste it to my host, so they understand what the
issue is. The work around they proposed, and which did work, was to publish
the site using FTP, rather than the first choice on the FP list.
"Ronx" wrote:
> First, there are no FP2003 extensions - the latest are 2002
> extensions.
>
> The error message "No sharepoint services installed" is generic, and
> covers both sharepoint and FP extensions.
>
> If the subdomain is a folder within your main site, you must refer to
> it as http://example.com/subdomainname when using FP to edit or
> publish to it, or the error message will result. FP looks for
> information in the root of the destination web, this info. does not
> exist in http://subdomainname.example.com, but does exist in
> http://example.com.
>
> If you wish to edit/publish to http://subdomain.example.com then
> subdomain must be set up as a completely different web site (often
> means a different hosting package - depends on host) to the main site.
> --
> Ron Symonds
> Microsoft MVP (FrontPage)
> Reply only to group - emails will be deleted unread.
>
> "waltstime" <waltstime@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
> news:EFDBBB64-CC48-4A3B-95D9-ECD2DC69BC86@microsoft.com...
>
>
>
| |
|
| Indiscriminate use of FTP will break/corrupt the extensions.
Forgot in my first response, if the subdomain is a folder in the main
web, it should be converted into a subweb.
--
Ron Symonds
Microsoft MVP (FrontPage)
Reply only to group - emails will be deleted unread.
"sharepoint services" <sharepoint services@discussions.microsoft.com>
wrote in message
news:1257FD13-1E6D-43E8-8240-B3B896E42F79@microsoft.com...[vbcol=seagreen]
> Thanks. I will copy and paste it to my host, so they understand
> what the
> issue is. The work around they proposed, and which did work, was to
> publish
> the site using FTP, rather than the first choice on the FP list.
>
> "Ronx" wrote:
>
|
|
|
|
|