|
Home > Archive > BizTalk Server General > October 2004 > Using BizTalk Rule Engine
You are viewing an archived Text-only version of the thread.
To view this thread in it's original format and/or if you want to reply to
this thread please [click here]
| Author |
Using BizTalk Rule Engine
|
|
| ksuranga 2004-10-25, 7:48 am |
| Hi All,
I want to consider using BizTalk rules engine for an application. This
application needs is to be hosted by an application service provider, and
therefor needs to cater to multiple clients. Each client need the
flexibility of having its own rules.
I've been looking at BizTalk and cant seem to find an way to be able to have
some sort of grouping that will enable me to have a group of policies for
each clients. Is it possible to do this using BizTalk?. Is there anyother
(maybe 3rd party front end like the Business Rule Composer ) that might help
with this?
Thanks
KSuranga.
| |
| Matt Milner 2004-10-25, 5:49 pm |
| I don't think there is a grouping, but there is a little documented security
api that allows you to set security on policies and, I believe,
vocabularies, that you might be able to leverage for the same purpose. In
addition you then ensure that people can only edit their own policies.
Not sure if this is a supported API/feature, but I'd look into it in your
case as it seems like a fit.
Matt
"ksuranga" <k_munasinghe@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:%23lDN$fpuEHA.2316@TK2MSFTNGP15.phx.gbl...
> Hi All,
>
> I want to consider using BizTalk rules engine for an application. This
> application needs is to be hosted by an application service provider, and
> therefor needs to cater to multiple clients. Each client need the
> flexibility of having its own rules.
>
> I've been looking at BizTalk and cant seem to find an way to be able to
> have
> some sort of grouping that will enable me to have a group of policies for
> each clients. Is it possible to do this using BizTalk?. Is there anyother
> (maybe 3rd party front end like the Business Rule Composer ) that might
> help
> with this?
>
> Thanks
>
> KSuranga.
>
>
>
|
|
|
|
|