|
Home > Archive > BizTalk Server General > November 2004 > BizTalk - to - BizTalk messaging
You are viewing an archived Text-only version of the thread.
To view this thread in it's original format and/or if you want to reply to
this thread please [click here]
| Author |
BizTalk - to - BizTalk messaging
|
|
| Hugo Rodger-Brown 2004-11-11, 7:46 am |
| When two companies, both running BizTalk implementations, need to exchange
messages, what is the best way to do this?
We're currently designing an implementation that uses orchestrations to
consume external web services to send data to a third party. If the third
party now implement BizTalk at their end, would it make sense to change the
sending mechanism (to MSMQT?), and if so, why, and how?
Hugo
http://hugo.rodger-brown.com
| |
|
|
| Matt Meleski 2004-11-11, 5:49 pm |
| MSMQT would be the best option, but as the post above stated, there could
be ports to be open on your firewalls. If you do have the port issue, or they
can open them up, I would go with the more reliable transport mechanism.
Matt.
"Nick Doyle" wrote:
> I would stick with web services because you won't need to [convince your
> sysadmins to] open your firewalls.
> "Publishing an Orchestration as a Web Service" :
> http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/d...rvices_gfje.asp
| |
| Greg Forsythe 2004-11-12, 8:46 pm |
| Another consideration would be the WSE adapter, although still in beta it
could give you the best of both worlds
Greg
"Matt Meleski" <MattMeleski@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:80AD109B-1524-4E3B-839C-9C307B32C8E4@microsoft.com...
> MSMQT would be the best option, but as the post above stated, there could
> be ports to be open on your firewalls. If you do have the port issue, or
they[vbcol=seagreen]
> can open them up, I would go with the more reliable transport mechanism.
>
> Matt.
>
> "Nick Doyle" wrote:
>
http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/d...rvices_gfje.asp
|
|
|
|
|