|
Home > Archive > BizTalk Server General > December 2004 > xs:import problems
You are viewing an archived Text-only version of the thread.
To view this thread in it's original format and/or if you want to reply to
this thread please [click here]
| Author |
xs:import problems
|
|
| Hugo Rodger-Brown 2004-12-03, 7:46 am |
| I'm having problems with imported xsd's and duplicate definitions, and hope
someone can help me out.
I have a schema that contains a number of common data types - A
This is imported into two separate schema - B and C.
I then have a fourth schema that needs to import both B and C. I can import
one or other, but if I try and import the second I get the following:
1. The simpleType 'http://xyz.com/schemas/CommonDataTypes:VERSION_NUMBER'
has already been declared. An error occurred at ...
etc.
Is there any way round this, without simply redeclaring all the common data
types in each schema?
Hugo
| |
| Bob Corcoran 2004-12-03, 7:46 am |
| I had a similar issue when importing a complex schema. In some of the
imported schemas, I was receiving the following message when I tried to
validate them:
'PostalAddress.xsd Node "<Schema>" - This schema file has a TypeName that
collides with the RootNode TypeName of one of its root nodes. Make sure that
they are different.'
I was able to correct this error by right clicking on the <schema> node and
changing the 'Root Refernce' property from 'default' to the referenced type
in question.
"Hugo Rodger-Brown" wrote:
> I'm having problems with imported xsd's and duplicate definitions, and hope
> someone can help me out.
>
> I have a schema that contains a number of common data types - A
>
> This is imported into two separate schema - B and C.
>
> I then have a fourth schema that needs to import both B and C. I can import
> one or other, but if I try and import the second I get the following:
>
> 1. The simpleType 'http://xyz.com/schemas/CommonDataTypes:VERSION_NUMBER'
> has already been declared. An error occurred at ...
>
> etc.
>
> Is there any way round this, without simply redeclaring all the common data
> types in each schema?
>
> Hugo
>
>
>
|
|
|
|
|