BizTalk Server General - Which is faster way to call an orchestration?

This is Interesting: Free IT Magazines  
Home > Archive > BizTalk Server General > January 2005 > Which is faster way to call an orchestration?





You are viewing an archived Text-only version of the thread. To view this thread in it's original format and/or if you want to reply to this thread please [click here]

Author Which is faster way to call an orchestration?
Ivan Jocic

2005-01-29, 7:47 am

Hi,
I have a performance doubt. Which is faster to execute: call
orchestration using call orchestration shape or use direct port binding
to pass message between'em?

Thanks,
Ivan

Jon Flanders[DevelopMentor]

2005-01-29, 5:53 pm

The Call Orchestration shape turns into an in-process call inside of the
host to the Orchestration type being called. Direct Port binding goes back
to the message box, so logically Call Orchestration must be faster since it
doesn't require a round-trip to the message box.

--
Jon Flanders [DevelopMentor]
http://staff.develop.com/jfland/
http://www.develop.com/courses/biztalk
"Ivan Jocic" <ivan_jocic@msn.com> wrote in message
news:1107002771.422961.119380@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
> Hi,
> I have a performance doubt. Which is faster to execute: call
> orchestration using call orchestration shape or use direct port binding
> to pass message between'em?
>
> Thanks,
> Ivan
>



Ivan Jocic

2005-01-31, 7:47 am

Thank you, Jon!

Jon Flanders[DevelopMentor]

2005-01-31, 5:53 pm

You are very welcome.

--
Jon Flanders [DevelopMentor]
http://staff.develop.com/jfland/
http://www.develop.com/courses/biztalk
"Ivan Jocic" <ivan_jocic@msn.com> wrote in message
news:1107171140.834282.313470@c13g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
> Thank you, Jon!
>



Sponsored Links






Free braindumps | Software forum | Database administration forum

Copyright 2003 - 2008 webservertalk.com