|
Home > Archive > BizTalk Server General > October 2005 > Biztalk Performance - Priority settings
You are viewing an archived Text-only version of the thread.
To view this thread in it's original format and/or if you want to reply to
this thread please [click here]
| Author |
Biztalk Performance - Priority settings
|
|
| boedtkjer@hotmail.com 2005-10-24, 10:37 am |
| Hi,
Consider the following Biztalk 2004 setup:
Process 1: RecPort#1->SendPort#1
Process 2: RecPort#2->Orchestration#2->SendPort#2
Process 3: RecPort#3->Orchestration#3->SendPort#3
I want process 1 to have the highest priority, process 2 the second
highest and process 3 the lowest priority.
Process 3 handles a lot of big messages, while process 1 and 2 only
handles a few small messages. If possible, I want process 3 to go
"stand-by" as soon as process 1 or 2 receives a message.
I have already set the send port subscription priority:
SendPort#1: 1
SendPort#2: 5
SendPort#3: 10
Can I do anything else to ensure prioritizing??
Thank you in advance for answering.
Regards,
Morten
| |
| Deepak Lakshmanan 2005-10-24, 10:37 am |
| Hi,
I'm afraid that there is not much prioritizing you can do in your case. The
only thing I can think of is, if you are running multiple machines, you can
dedicate a host instance for Process 1, so that it will be the only process
on that machine. However this solution might or might not work based on your
architecture.
Hope this Helps.
--
Deepak
http://biztalkblogs.com/deepakl
"boedtkjer@hotmail.com" wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Consider the following Biztalk 2004 setup:
>
> Process 1: RecPort#1->SendPort#1
> Process 2: RecPort#2->Orchestration#2->SendPort#2
> Process 3: RecPort#3->Orchestration#3->SendPort#3
>
> I want process 1 to have the highest priority, process 2 the second
> highest and process 3 the lowest priority.
>
> Process 3 handles a lot of big messages, while process 1 and 2 only
> handles a few small messages. If possible, I want process 3 to go
> "stand-by" as soon as process 1 or 2 receives a message.
>
> I have already set the send port subscription priority:
> SendPort#1: 1
> SendPort#2: 5
> SendPort#3: 10
>
> Can I do anything else to ensure prioritizing??
>
> Thank you in advance for answering.
>
> Regards,
> Morten
>
>
| |
| boedtkjer@hotmail.com 2005-10-25, 5:52 pm |
| Hi,
Thanks, Depak.
I separated the processes into different hosts. This combined with the
priority settings seems to make performance better on process 1 and 2.
However I will consider changing my setup from one server to two
servers. One for high priority messages and one for low priority
messages.
Regards,
Morten
Deepak Lakshmanan skrev:
[vbcol=seagreen]
> Hi,
>
> I'm afraid that there is not much prioritizing you can do in your case. The
> only thing I can think of is, if you are running multiple machines, you can
> dedicate a host instance for Process 1, so that it will be the only process
> on that machine. However this solution might or might not work based on your
> architecture.
>
> Hope this Helps.
> --
> Deepak
> http://biztalkblogs.com/deepakl
>
>
>
> "boedtkjer@hotmail.com" wrote:
>
|
|
|
|
|