|
Home > Archive > BizTalk Server General > October 2005 > web service call through receive port?
You are viewing an archived Text-only version of the thread.
To view this thread in it's original format and/or if you want to reply to
this thread please [click here]
| Author |
web service call through receive port?
|
|
| Eunice Huang 2005-10-26, 5:52 pm |
| I have a web service running on my machine, and I want my BTS calls this web
service and retrieve data back.
-- How can I do this without implementing an orchestration?
-- Is it posible to specify a receive location to point to my web
service? (if so how do I know which method I am calling?)
-- I tried to add a HTTP type or a SOAP type of receive location to my
receive port, I always get "Could not store transport type data for Receive
Location 'Receive Location1" to config store, Access is denied." Do you have
any idea about this?
Thanks in advance.
--Eunice
| |
| Jon Flanders 2005-10-26, 5:52 pm |
| Eunice,
my answers inline
Jon Flanders [MVP]
http://www.masteringbiztalk.com
> I have a web service running on my machine, and I want my BTS calls
> this web
> service and retrieve data back.
> -- How can I do this without implementing an orchestration?
Jon - In BizTalk 2004 this isn't possible (e.g. you must use an Orchestration
to call a Web Service)
> -- Is it posible to specify a receive location to point to my web
> service? (if so how do I know which method I am calling?)
Jon - You want a receive location using SOAP when you want to *expose* your
BizTalk application using a Web Service - not when you want to call one.
> -- I tried to add a HTTP type or a SOAP type of receive location
> to my
> receive port, I always get "Could not store transport type data for
> Receive
> Location 'Receive Location1" to config store, Access is denied." Do
> you have any idea about this?
Jon - this is an indication that you cannot call into the SSO service. Check
to make sure the ENTSSO service is running, check the event log for any errors
- it is almost always related to DCOM security.
>
> Thanks in advance.
> --Eunice
|
|
|
|
|