|
Home > Archive > BizTalk Server General > May 2005 > Adding filters to a Dynamic Send Port
You are viewing an archived Text-only version of the thread.
To view this thread in it's original format and/or if you want to reply to
this thread please [click here]
| Author |
Adding filters to a Dynamic Send Port
|
|
| Craig Neuwirt 2005-05-10, 5:55 pm |
| Is is legal to add filters to a DynamicSendPort? Basically, I have an
orchestration that receives requests on a static one-way receive port and
sends responses on a dynamic one-way send port. Typically, MSMT is used for
receiving and delivering. I have a custom pipeline attached to the
ReceivePort and if I experience an exception within the pipeline, I would
like the pipeline to return a message (in GetNext) that is picked up by the
DynamicSendPort. I would like to use filters/subscriptions in the
DynamicSendPort to acheive this. However, since the port is dynamic, it is
created automatically and I am not sure if I can safely update it.
thanks,
craig
| |
| Stephen W. Thomas 2005-05-10, 5:55 pm |
| Hello.
I think you would be able to use an Orchestration that subscribes to the
NACK that would be generated from the Pipeline / Receive failure. Then, the
Orchestration would great your dynamic port and send the response message.
I think it would be hard to get the pipeline to do this for you. In any
case, you might not have access to your original message since it failed
inside the pipeline.
Hope this helps.
Stephen W. Thomas
http://www.geekswithblogs.net/sthomas
"Craig Neuwirt" wrote:
> Is is legal to add filters to a DynamicSendPort? Basically, I have an
> orchestration that receives requests on a static one-way receive port and
> sends responses on a dynamic one-way send port. Typically, MSMT is used for
> receiving and delivering. I have a custom pipeline attached to the
> ReceivePort and if I experience an exception within the pipeline, I would
> like the pipeline to return a message (in GetNext) that is picked up by the
> DynamicSendPort. I would like to use filters/subscriptions in the
> DynamicSendPort to acheive this. However, since the port is dynamic, it is
> created automatically and I am not sure if I can safely update it.
>
> thanks,
> craig
>
>
>
|
|
|
|
|