| Author |
Deploying two copies of the same orchestration
|
|
| MattBell 2005-06-24, 5:54 pm |
| I have an orchestration which I need to basically deploy twice, each time
pointing to different send and receive ports. Is there a way to make a copy
of the BizTalk assembly and redeploy it, or do you have to basically rebuild
the whole thing?
Basically I need one orch pointed towards a production environment and one
pointed towards a training/testing environment.
Any help is much appreciated,
Matt Bell
| |
| Jon Flanders[MVP] 2005-06-24, 8:48 pm |
| You just need to change the Assembly Version number in the project
properties.
--
Jon Flanders
http://www.masteringbiztalk.com/blogs/jon/
"MattBell" <MattBell@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:7CA83CFB-1F60-4993-BEA3-31C28C794D81@microsoft.com...
>I have an orchestration which I need to basically deploy twice, each time
> pointing to different send and receive ports. Is there a way to make a
> copy
> of the BizTalk assembly and redeploy it, or do you have to basically
> rebuild
> the whole thing?
> Basically I need one orch pointed towards a production environment and one
> pointed towards a training/testing environment.
>
> Any help is much appreciated,
> Matt Bell
>
| |
| MattBell 2005-06-25, 5:49 pm |
| Well that's easy enough, and they will both work in tandem on the same server?
"Jon Flanders[MVP]" wrote:
> You just need to change the Assembly Version number in the project
> properties.
>
> --
> Jon Flanders
> http://www.masteringbiztalk.com/blogs/jon/
>
> "MattBell" <MattBell@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
> news:7CA83CFB-1F60-4993-BEA3-31C28C794D81@microsoft.com...
>
>
>
| |
| Jon Flanders[MVP] 2005-06-26, 5:52 pm |
| Yes - that is the idea.
--
Jon Flanders
http://www.masteringbiztalk.com/blogs/jon/
"MattBell" <MattBell@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:44E7E1C1-023D-4664-BACB-C2D64723FAD8@microsoft.com...[vbcol=seagreen]
> Well that's easy enough, and they will both work in tandem on the same
> server?
>
> "Jon Flanders[MVP]" wrote:
>
|
|
|
|