|
Home > Archive > BizTalk Server General > May 2006 > Solicit-Response Port Without an Orchestration
You are viewing an archived Text-only version of the thread.
To view this thread in it's original format and/or if you want to reply to
this thread please [click here]
| Author |
Solicit-Response Port Without an Orchestration
|
|
|
| Hi there:
Does anyone has a solution to workaround a soliciti-response port WITHOUT
using an Orchestration?
I am using a solicit-response port to send a request and receive a response
but I am not allowed to use an Orchestration. Is it even possible?
Thanks a million!
Regards,
Shamod
| |
| Scott Colestock 2006-05-23, 7:15 pm |
| You can certainly wire up a solit response send port to a two-way receive
port - (you can subscribe in the send port via message type or
bts.receiveportname, etc.)
You will have the opportunity to run a map & a pipeline on either (or both)
sides. If the work you are doing will fit that model, you should be in good
shape.
Scott Colestock
www.traceofthought.net
"Sam" <Sam@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:37478032-2CB9-4BA7-A1AF-4E5B31DFC908@microsoft.com...
> Hi there:
>
> Does anyone has a solution to workaround a soliciti-response port WITHOUT
> using an Orchestration?
>
> I am using a solicit-response port to send a request and receive a
> response
> but I am not allowed to use an Orchestration. Is it even possible?
>
> Thanks a million!
>
> Regards,
> Shamod
| |
|
| Scott,
Can you please elaborate a bit more on "wire up a solicit-response port to a
two-way receive port"?
Thanks for your help!
"Scott Colestock" wrote:
> You can certainly wire up a solit response send port to a two-way receive
> port - (you can subscribe in the send port via message type or
> bts.receiveportname, etc.)
>
> You will have the opportunity to run a map & a pipeline on either (or both)
> sides. If the work you are doing will fit that model, you should be in good
> shape.
>
> Scott Colestock
> www.traceofthought.net
>
>
>
> "Sam" <Sam@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
> news:37478032-2CB9-4BA7-A1AF-4E5B31DFC908@microsoft.com...
>
>
>
| |
| Scott Colestock 2006-05-24, 1:14 pm |
| If you create a two-way receive port within BizTalk, and you also create a
static solit-response port, you will find that in the properties of the
solicit-response port you can select - under "filters and maps" - a filters
node. There, you can select "BTS.ReceivePortName", and use the "=="
operator, and in the right-most column put in the name of your receive port
that you created.
At that point, your solicit-response port is "subscribed" to your receive
port.
If that isn't clear, let me know -
Scott Colestock
www.traceofthought.net
"Sam" <Sam@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:524F5C53-D2CB-41FA-B074-A9506DE16868@microsoft.com...[vbcol=seagreen]
> Scott,
>
> Can you please elaborate a bit more on "wire up a solicit-response port to
> a
> two-way receive port"?
>
> Thanks for your help!
>
>
> "Scott Colestock" wrote:
>
|
|
|
|
|