BizTalk Server - BTS2002 Adpter for FTP

This is Interesting: Free IT Magazines  
Home > Archive > BizTalk Server > March 2004 > BTS2002 Adpter for FTP





You are viewing an archived Text-only version of the thread. To view this thread in it's original format and/or if you want to reply to this thread please [click here]

Author BTS2002 Adpter for FTP
AV

2004-03-11, 10:42 pm

I installed the MS BTS2002 Adpter for FTP and configured
a FTP Receive Function. This receive function is hooked
up to a messaging channel and a messaging port. The
primary transport type of the messaging port is File and
the primary transport address is file://C:\FTPTest\%
src_filename%. When this receive job downloads the file,
it is saved with the
%src_filename% symbol instead of the source filename. I
tried with and without the Pass-through flag submission
but got the same result.

Then I also configured a File Receive Function to the
same messaging channel and mesaging port, and I got the
original file name instead of %src_filename% symbol.

Is this a BUG in the adapter or something I am doing
wrong.

Thank you very much in advance for anything you may be
able to offer.

Regards

AV

R.Balaji

2004-03-18, 1:59 pm

Hi,

Are you using any preprocessor?

If you use any preprocessor, then you might loose the filename information.

Regards,
R.Balaji


"AV" <anonymous@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:b23c01c40783$d3bf8230$a401280a@phx.gbl...
> I installed the MS BTS2002 Adpter for FTP and configured
> a FTP Receive Function. This receive function is hooked
> up to a messaging channel and a messaging port. The
> primary transport type of the messaging port is File and
> the primary transport address is file://C:\FTPTest\%
> src_filename%. When this receive job downloads the file,
> it is saved with the
> %src_filename% symbol instead of the source filename. I
> tried with and without the Pass-through flag submission
> but got the same result.
>
> Then I also configured a File Receive Function to the
> same messaging channel and mesaging port, and I got the
> original file name instead of %src_filename% symbol.
>
> Is this a BUG in the adapter or something I am doing
> wrong.
>
> Thank you very much in advance for anything you may be
> able to offer.
>
> Regards
>
> AV
>



AV

2004-03-18, 1:59 pm

No I am not using any pre-processor.

Regards,
AV

>-----Original Message-----
>Hi,
>
>Are you using any preprocessor?
>
>If you use any preprocessor, then you might loose the

filename information.
>
>Regards,
>R.Balaji
>
>
>"AV" <anonymous@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in

message
>news:b23c01c40783$d3bf8230$a401280a@phx.gbl...
configured[color=darkred]
hooked[color=darkred]
and[color=darkred]
file,[color=darkred]
I[color=darkred]
>
>
>.
>

Sponsored Links






Free braindumps | Software forum | Database administration forum

Copyright 2003 - 2008 webservertalk.com