BizTalk Server - Using Strong-Named Assemblies

This is Interesting: Free IT Magazines  
Home > Archive > BizTalk Server > March 2004 > Using Strong-Named Assemblies





You are viewing an archived Text-only version of the thread. To view this thread in it's original format and/or if you want to reply to this thread please [click here]

Author Using Strong-Named Assemblies
Timothy J. Brown

2004-03-23, 3:56 pm

Hello,

I am in the process of configuring a new installation of BT2004 developer
edition as a trial. I currently have a component framework that we built
that acts as a proxy layer to our web services tier. I want to include the
component framework dll's as references in my BizTalk assembly. One of our
contractors insists that theses assembiles MUST be Strong-Named in order to
deploy and access them. We have been using these dll's(assemblies) in our
asp.net implementation for almost a year without Strong-Naming and we have
had no problems.

Is there a limitation on BT 2004 or is there a configuration that we are not
aware of?

TIA,

Tim


John Plummer [MSFT]

2004-03-24, 4:36 am

BizTalk deploys its artifacts to the GAC and therefore requires strong
names.


--
This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights.
Use of included script samples are subject to the terms specified at
http://www.microsoft.com/info/cpyright.htm


"Timothy J. Brown" <tbrown@airnet.com> wrote in message
news:Om2mLEREEHA.3404@TK2MSFTNGP10.phx.gbl...
Hello,

I am in the process of configuring a new installation of BT2004 developer
edition as a trial. I currently have a component framework that we built
that acts as a proxy layer to our web services tier. I want to include the
component framework dll's as references in my BizTalk assembly. One of our
contractors insists that theses assembiles MUST be Strong-Named in order to
deploy and access them. We have been using these dll's(assemblies) in our
asp.net implementation for almost a year without Strong-Naming and we have
had no problems.

Is there a limitation on BT 2004 or is there a configuration that we are not
aware of?

TIA,

Tim



Sponsored Links






Free braindumps | Software forum | Database administration forum

Copyright 2003 - 2008 webservertalk.com