|
Home > Archive > BizTalk Server > May 2004 > What does Biztalk sign?
You are viewing an archived Text-only version of the thread.
To view this thread in it's original format and/or if you want to reply to
this thread please [click here]
| Author |
What does Biztalk sign?
|
|
| Gionni 2004-03-03, 10:36 am |
| Hello everyone,
I'm writing a code that should take a plain text and a certificate
and return a S/MIME message so Biztalk could understand it. Something
similar to Chilkat (www.chilkat.com), but with less funtionalities
(Chilkat is too expensive for my use). I'm using C# and Capicom.
Question 1: does Biztalk digitally sign something more than the plain
text (e.g. some headers)? Question 2: does Biztalk encrypt or do
something before signing?
I used Chilkat evaluation version and the sign is the same of mine in
the first part (information from certificate I suppose), but differs
in the last part (the real sign I suppose). In consequence, Bitzalk
understands the Chilkat document, but fails validition of mine.
Thanks to all, Gionni
| |
| Kartik Paramasivam 2004-05-13, 9:35 pm |
| Biztalk 2004 has MIME capability on receive and send pipeline.
You can configure your send pipeline to have MIME_SMIME encoder and
configure the encoder to produce either a signed or encrypted mail or both.
Similarly you can create a receive pipeline with MIME decoder which would
verify the signature in a MIME message/ decrypt it and decode it.
The sdk should have more information on how to configure the MIME encoder.
thanks
Kartik
| >>Hello everyone,
| >> I'm writing a code that should take a plain text and a certificate
| >>and return a S/MIME message so Biztalk could understand it. Something
| >>similar to Chilkat (www.chilkat.com), but with less funtionalities
| >>(Chilkat is too expensive for my use). I'm using C# and Capicom.
| >>Question 1: does Biztalk digitally sign something more than the plain
| >>text (e.g. some headers)? Question 2: does Biztalk encrypt or do
| >>something before signing?
| >>
| >>I used Chilkat evaluation version and the sign is the same of mine in
| >>the first part (information from certificate I suppose), but differs
| >>in the last part (the real sign I suppose). In consequence, Bitzalk
| >>understands the Chilkat document, but fails validition of mine.
| >>
| >>Thanks to all, Gionni
| >>
This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights.
EBusiness Server Team
|
|
|
|
|