|
Home > Archive > BizTalk Server > July 2004 > Do we still need MSMQ?
You are viewing an archived Text-only version of the thread.
To view this thread in it's original format and/or if you want to reply to
this thread please [click here]
| Author |
Do we still need MSMQ?
|
|
| johnny 2004-07-05, 5:50 pm |
| We all have been using MSMQ server/service for years. Now MSMQT is part of
BizTalk and remote applications can send messages to MSMQT directly. If
money is not a concern, is there any reason we will still have to use MSMQ?
-Johnny
| |
| Montaque 2004-07-09, 3:32 pm |
| msmq is not necessary for biztalk only.
"johnny" <jc00kc@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:u10nokuYEHA.1224@TK2MSFTNGP09.phx.gbl...
> We all have been using MSMQ server/service for years. Now MSMQT is part of
> BizTalk and remote applications can send messages to MSMQT directly. If
> money is not a concern, is there any reason we will still have to use
MSMQ?
>
> -Johnny
>
>
| |
| Jan Eliasen 2004-07-09, 3:32 pm |
| Hi.
As Montaque has written, perhaps other systems use MSMQ. BizTalk 2002
it self uses it...
But if you do not have any other programs that use MSMQ, then it isn't
necessary, no.
Jan Eliasen
On Mon, 5 Jul 2004 19:38:19 -0400, "johnny" <jc00kc@hotmail.com>
wrote:
>We all have been using MSMQ server/service for years. Now MSMQT is part of
>BizTalk and remote applications can send messages to MSMQT directly. If
>money is not a concern, is there any reason we will still have to use MSMQ?
>
>-Johnny
>
--
Jan Eliasen, representing himself and not the company he works for.
| |
| Nick Malik 2004-07-09, 3:32 pm |
| MSMQT is built on top of MSMQ and is a Biztalk-only transaction layer.
You need MSMQ somewhere in the network if you want to use message oriented
middleware designs in your application architecture.
--- Nick
"johnny" <jc00kc@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:u10nokuYEHA.1224@TK2MSFTNGP09.phx.gbl...
> We all have been using MSMQ server/service for years. Now MSMQT is part of
> BizTalk and remote applications can send messages to MSMQT directly. If
> money is not a concern, is there any reason we will still have to use
MSMQ?
>
> -Johnny
>
>
| |
| Michael Roze [MSFTF] 2004-07-09, 3:32 pm |
| To be more specific.
No. MSMQ is not necessary for BizTalk Server 2004 to function.
However, you can have it installed side-by-side with BizTalk Server 2004.
Please refer to the documentation on how to accomplish this.
Yes, you will still need some way of originating messages [E.g MSMQ:
Outgoing Queues] as input to BizTalk.
If you wish to send to destination MSMQ queues you will need them setup
somewhere on the network.
Also, it is important to note that MSMQT is transactional and guarantees
in-ordered delivery. This has side-effects of serialization.
If that is not what you need, then you might consider using MSMQ natively.
Thanks,
MRoze
This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights.
EBusiness Server Team
[vbcol=seagreen]
of[vbcol=seagreen]
|
|
|
|
|