BizTalk Server - Script Functoid - inline c# vs GAC

This is Interesting: Free IT Magazines  
Home > Archive > BizTalk Server > July 2005 > Script Functoid - inline c# vs GAC





You are viewing an archived Text-only version of the thread. To view this thread in it's original format and/or if you want to reply to this thread please [click here]

Author Script Functoid - inline c# vs GAC
pfeifest

2005-07-22, 5:50 pm

Hello-

When I am using the Script functoid in the mapper when would I use
inline c# vs the GAC?

I assume I'd use inline c# when the code is specific to that map and
won't be used anywhere else. I also assume it can be inline when
minimal numbers of transactions are running through that map.

Thanks-

pfeifest

Jeff Lynch

2005-07-22, 5:50 pm

I'm not sure there is a performance hit for using inline C# vs. calling an
external assembly from your map since the map is compiled into an assembly
anyway. I tend to use inline code unless in my maps to keep everything
"together".

--
Jeff Lynch
"A BizTalk Enthusiast"
http://codebetter.com/blogs/jeff.lynch


"pfeifest" <pfeifest@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:1122060366.176386.198520@g47g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
> Hello-
>
> When I am using the Script functoid in the mapper when would I use
> inline c# vs the GAC?
>
> I assume I'd use inline c# when the code is specific to that map and
> won't be used anywhere else. I also assume it can be inline when
> minimal numbers of transactions are running through that map.
>
> Thanks-
>
> pfeifest
>



pfeifest

2005-07-22, 5:50 pm

Thank you for the reply. I'd much rather use inline c# just so I don't
have to worry about the GAC and deployment.

Sponsored Links






Free braindumps | Software forum | Database administration forum

Copyright 2003 - 2008 webservertalk.com