| Paul Davidson 2004-09-02, 8:47 pm |
| Not sure if you escalated yet(which might necessary if the COM+ theory
doesn't work) but it's looking more like an RPC issue itself based on your
feedback. The easiest/quickest thing might be just rebuilding the machine.
Under the security tab, I have these settings:
"Enforce access checks for this application"
"Perform access checks at the process and component level."
"Enable Authentication"
Under the "Activation" tab, I have these:
"Libarary application"
"Identity" tab values grayed out.
Do you have "Default Protocol" configuration information(dcomcnfg -> right
click "my computer" -> properties)? I have no port ranges defined and both
grayed out assignment/allocation fields have "Internet range" picked.
--------------------
Date: Mon, 23 Aug 2004 23:49:38 +1000
From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Asbj=F8rn_Rygg?= <a-rygg@online.no.invalid>
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.7.3 (Windows/20040803)
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: Re: SSO problems - error code 0X800706BA (RPC server not available
References: <75C1989F-1616-4315-8089-17DB9CB15F76@microsoft.com>
<RWt4oPwfEHA.3636@cpmsftngxa06.phx.gbl>
<#DL9tK7fEHA.4040@TK2MSFTNGP10.phx.gbl>
<eQzMKJ9fEHA.2640@cpmsftngxa06.phx.gbl>
<73DF6A3D-F0D9-4429-87AC-8F1FC1C466CD@microsoft.com>
<ucHp52HgEHA.2764@TK2MSFTNGP11.phx.gbl>
<wNl$lDLgEHA.1200@cpmsftngxa06.phx.gbl>
<#zykQYMgEHA.592@TK2MSFTNGP11.phx.gbl>
<Zr#05#VgEHA.740@cpmsftngxa06.phx.gbl>
<uJOxYX4gEHA.1356@TK2MSFTNGP09.phx.gbl>
<shirv#HhEHA.740@cpmsftngxa06.phx.gbl>
<#RXnVbRhEHA.3664@TK2MSFTNGP11.phx.gbl>
<AtqdWvVhEHA.1600@cpmsftngxa06.phx.gbl>
<e60LDQthEHA.1184@TK2MSFTNGP12.phx.gbl>
<vIBEFjuhEHA.3024@cpmsftngxa10.phx.gbl>
In-Reply-To: <vIBEFjuhEHA.3024@cpmsftngxa10.phx.gbl>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Message-ID: <OCpqKgRiEHA.2704@TK2MSFTNGP10.phx.gbl>
Newsgroups: microsoft.public.biztalk.setup
NNTP-Posting-Host: d211-29-172-170.dsl.nsw.optusnet.com.au 211.29.172.170
Lines: 1
Path:
cpmsftngxa10.phx.gbl!TK2MSFTFEED01.phx.gbl!TK2MSFTNGP08.phx.gbl!TK2MSFTNGP10
.phx.gbl
Xref: cpmsftngxa10.phx.gbl microsoft.public.biztalk.setup:4422
X-Tomcat-NG: microsoft.public.biztalk.setup
Answers between text below:
> So on biztalkdev, if you ping it by name it returns 131.181.104.108 and
if
> you ping by ip, it returns 'biztalkdev' correct? I searched our internal
> archive and found that some folks used the loopback address(127.0.0.1)
> instead of the actual address and that worked for them. Perhaps a
> order/address combination in the host file will work for you?
When I ping biztalkdev, the reply is what the ip in the hosts file says
(127.0.0.1 when I set loopback, 131.181.104.108 when I set actual ip)
Pinging ip does not return the hostname in the heading of the reply,
just the ip address. Currently, I`m using
> Here's the fact list so far:
> 1. 2003 server (installed from CD or image?)
Installation: 2003 Standard Edition, MSDNAA iso image (don`t know if
that should differ from a regular MSDN image), MSDN edition of BizTalk
> 2. DTC is enabled(I've attached a screenshot of what the config should be)
DTC is enabled (Network DTC Access - Network Administration, Network
Transactions, Network Clients)
Could COM+ application security settings have anything to do with the
problem? I`ve been looking at the security tab for the ENTSSO
application under COM+ Applications -> ENTSSO, but I am not shure what
the settings should be..
> 3. hostfile contains default IP address on a NIC.(btw: is this static or
> dhcp? -trying to match my repro machine to your exact config)
hosts file maps machine name to actual ip (tried with multiple
combinations), DHCP configuration (I`ve also tried setting static ip,
without any luck)
I don`t have any WINS server available. The hosts file should be able to
handle the mapping itself(??). I can try installing a WINS server on the
local machine to se if it can resolve correctly then, I`ll try that when
I get back to the machine tomorrow.
I`ve also tested by setting the machine to "Enable netbios over tcp/ip"
instead of "Use settings from DHCP server".
> 4. part of a workgroup named 'workgroup', not joined to domain.
True
> 5. logged in as local administrator
True
Both administrator and the biztalk service user is member of all BizTalk
created groups.
> Is biztalkdev the original name of the machine?
Yes
> Have you tried turning off RPC security? I know DTC is working, but it's
> worth a shot: http://support.microsoft.com/?id=839187 (reboot required
> after setting this key)
Tried that earlier with no result (further up this thread)
> Another thing to try would be uninstall/reinstall msdtc:
> http://support.microsoft.com/?id=246679 or repair 2003 itself as a last
> resort.
I tried reinstalling msdtc as explained in the link you provided, no
change of situation. Repairing the 2003 installation would seem kind of
strange, as I started off with a fresh install.. But it might work as a
last resort..
Thanks,
Asbjørn
> --------------------
> Date: Sat, 21 Aug 2004 02:37:11 +1000
> From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Asbj=F8rn_Rygg?= <a-rygg@online.no.invalid>
> User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.7.3 (Windows/20040803)
> X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
> MIME-Version: 1.0
> Subject: Re: SSO problems - error code 0X800706BA (RPC server not
available
> References: <75C1989F-1616-4315-8089-17DB9CB15F76@microsoft.com>
> <RWt4oPwfEHA.3636@cpmsftngxa06.phx.gbl>
> <#DL9tK7fEHA.4040@TK2MSFTNGP10.phx.gbl>
> <eQzMKJ9fEHA.2640@cpmsftngxa06.phx.gbl>
> <73DF6A3D-F0D9-4429-87AC-8F1FC1C466CD@microsoft.com>
> <ucHp52HgEHA.2764@TK2MSFTNGP11.phx.gbl>
> <wNl$lDLgEHA.1200@cpmsftngxa06.phx.gbl>
> <#zykQYMgEHA.592@TK2MSFTNGP11.phx.gbl>
> <Zr#05#VgEHA.740@cpmsftngxa06.phx.gbl>
> <uJOxYX4gEHA.1356@TK2MSFTNGP09.phx.gbl>
> <shirv#HhEHA.740@cpmsftngxa06.phx.gbl>
> <#RXnVbRhEHA.3664@TK2MSFTNGP11.phx.gbl>
> <AtqdWvVhEHA.1600@cpmsftngxa06.phx.gbl>
> In-Reply-To: <AtqdWvVhEHA.1600@cpmsftngxa06.phx.gbl>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
> Message-ID: <e60LDQthEHA.1184@TK2MSFTNGP12.phx.gbl>
> Newsgroups: microsoft.public.biztalk.setup
> NNTP-Posting-Host: d220-236-51-68.dsl.nsw.optusnet.com.au 220.236.51.68
> Lines: 1
> Path:
>
cpmsftngxa10.phx.gbl!TK2MSFTFEED01.phx.gbl!TK2MSFTNGP08.phx.gbl!TK2MSFTNGP12
> phx.gbl
> Xref: cpmsftngxa10.phx.gbl microsoft.public.biztalk.setup:4414
> X-Tomcat-NG: microsoft.public.biztalk.setup
>
> I`ve tried with both loopback and actual ip with same results. The
> hostfile on biztalkdev was changed, so that the real ip appears first in
> the hosts file - but with the same result. Hostfile is now:
> 131.181.104.108 biztalkdev
> 127.0.0.1 localhost
> I`ve also tried with actual ip on localhost instead of loopback.
>
> DTCTester works when running on localhost on biztalkdev, but not from
> any other machine to biztalkdev.
>
> An rpcdump on the biztalkdev machine gave:
>
> C:\>rpcdump /v
> Querying Endpoint Mapper Database...
> 0 registered endpoints found.
>
> rpcdump completed sucessfully after 1 seconds
>
> On my XP machine and a production 2003 server i tested on, this command
> lists all endpoints, 42 endpoints on my XP machine.. If I run rpcdump /i
> on the biztalkdev machine, rpcdump crashes with an illegal instruction
> message..
>
> Since rpc seems to not respond as desired, I checked what netstat gave
> me on port 135:
> D:\>netstat -aon | find "135"
> TCP 127.0.0.1:135 0.0.0.0:0 LISTENING 744
> TCP 131.181.104.108:135 0.0.0.0:0 LISTENING 744
>
> D:\>netstat -ao | find "744"
> TCP biztalkdev:epmap biztalkdev:0 LISTENING 744
> TCP biztalkdev:epmap biztalkdev:0 LISTENING 744
>
> Applied the same command to my xp machine, where I recieved that
> localhost was listening to both tcp and udp (which I assume is correct?):
> C:\>netstat -aon | find "135"
> TCP 0.0.0.0:135 0.0.0.0:0 LISTENING 1328
> UDP 0.0.0.0:135 *:* 1328
>
> C:\>netstat -ao | find "1328"
> TCP marius:epmap marius:0 LISTENING 1328
> UDP marius:epmap *:* 1328
> UDP marius:3179 *:* 1328
>
> Looks to me like RPC is disabled on the 2003 machine somehow, even
> though all settings indicate that it shouldn`t be. I haven`t set up any
> group policies that should interfer with rpc.
>
> One thing I could try when I get to the machine again is to see what the
> listing in netsh is telling me.. Maybe RPC could be set to offline in
> some way (?).
>
> - Asbjørn
>
>
> Paul Davidson wrote:
>
>
> address
>
>
> IP(127).
>
>
> available
>
enable[vbcol=seagreen]
<a-rygg.NOSPAM@online.no.invalid>[vbcol=seagreen]
>
cpmsftngxa06.phx.gbl!TK2MSFTNGXA03.phx.gbl!TK2MSFTNGXA01.phx.gbl!TK2MSFTNGP0
>
starting[vbcol=seagreen]
>
> 1
>
still[vbcol=seagreen]
d[vbcol=seagreen]
>
> e
>
>
> <a-rygg.NOSPAM@online.no.invalid>
>
>
> 220.236.51.68
>
>
> off
>
>
> in
>
>
> that
>
the[vbcol=seagreen]
it[vbcol=seagreen]
>
> is
>
to[vbcol=seagreen]
>
> with
>
the[vbcol=seagreen]
problem[vbcol=seagreen]
error[vbcol=seagreen]
>
> error
>
>
> error
>
>
|