| Tatyana Yakushev [MSFT] 2004-07-09, 5:48 pm |
| If you need to do this in BizTalk Mapper you will have to drop scripting functoid and write XSLT Template yourself.
Thanks,
Tatyana
--------------------
From: "Bhavin Sanghvi" <sanghvibk@hotmail.com>
References: <O5vCAKfVEHA.1152@TK2MSFTNGP09.phx.gbl>
Subject: Please HELP - Converting FLAT schema to Hirerachical Schema
Date: Sun, 20 Jun 2004 17:28:46 +0530
Lines: 43
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1409
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1409
Message-ID: <Omk#t3rVEHA.2544@TK2MSFTNGP10.phx.gbl>
Newsgroups: microsoft.public.biztalk.framework,microsoft.public.biztalk.orchestration,microsoft.public.biztalk.sdk,microsoft.public.biztalk.tools
NNTP-Posting-Host: 151-211-187-203.cable-client.iqara.net 203.187.211.151
Path: cpmsftngxa10.phx.gbl!TK2MSFTNGXA01.phx.gbl!TK2MSFTNGP08.phx.gbl!TK2MSFTNGP10.phx.gbl
Xref: cpmsftngxa10.phx.gbl microsoft.public.biztalk.orchestration:6633 microsoft.public.biztalk.sdk:2336 microsoft.public.biztalk.tools:3790
microsoft.public.biztalk.framework:3006
X-Tomcat-NG: microsoft.public.biztalk.framework
How can I achive this using BizTalk 2004 mapper.
source schema:
<ORDER>
<ID/>
<DATE/>
<NAME/>
<ITEMNO/>
<ITEMNAME/>
<QTY/>
</ORDER>
DESTINATION Schema:
<ORDER>
<ID/>
<DATE/>
<NAME/>
<ORDERDETAIL>
<ITEMNO/>
<ITEMNAME/>
<QTY/>
</ORDERDETAIL>
</ORDER>
Condition is ... all the detail items with same header MUST come under one
HEADER ELEMENT... At the moment what I get is ...
If there are three record in source ... I get three header with one detail
in each. and what I want is ... if all the three records have same header
then output should have one header and three details..
I hope I have explained clearly... and I want to use BizTalk 2004 mapper to
achieve this.
Any help appriciated....
Thanks. Bhavin
--
This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights. Use of included script samples are subject to the terms specified at
http://www.microsoft.com/info/cpyright.htm
Note: For the benefit of the community-at-large, all responses to this message are best directed to the newsgroup/thread from which they originated.
|