|
Home > Archive > BizTalk Server Applications Integration > March 2004 > bt 2004 distinguished fields
You are viewing an archived Text-only version of the thread.
To view this thread in it's original format and/or if you want to reply to
this thread please [click here]
| Author |
bt 2004 distinguished fields
|
|
|
| After installing the released version of BT 2004 I now get this message
"Some promoted properties may be invalid. " when trying to close the "show
promotions" dialog box. The schema was created with the beta and EAP
versions. The released version seems to run my solution just fine however.
If I remove the promotion for the distinguished fields that the message
complains about, it will not let me promote them again.
What I have noticed is that the fields it will not allow promotions for are
defined as records. This wasn't an issue in the earlier versions.
any ideas ?
Thanks!
Tim
| |
| larry franks 2004-03-23, 1:40 pm |
| Hi Tim, would you be able to post the schema you are having problems with?
Larry Franks
This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties,and confers no rights.
Subscribe at
http://support.microsoft.com/defaul...msdn/nospam.asp
&SD=msdn
--------------------
| Thread-Topic: bt 2004 distinguished fields
| thread-index: AcQQPqS9tm/w2naXRcS/houJ4jQ7Yw==
| X-Tomcat-NG: microsoft.public.biztalk.appintegration
| From: "=?Utf-8?B?VGltIEI=?=" <TimBur@seattletimes.com>
| Subject: bt 2004 distinguished fields
| Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2004 10:51:11 -0800
| Lines: 15
| Message-ID: <B218D409-1EB3-4C70-A2BC-3A085425DD00@microsoft.com>
| MIME-Version: 1.0
| Content-Type: text/plain;
| charset="Utf-8"
| Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
| X-Newsreader: Microsoft CDO for Windows 2000
| Content-Class: urn:content-classes:message
| Importance: normal
| Priority: normal
| X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.3790.0
| Newsgroups: microsoft.public.biztalk.appintegration
| Path: cpmsftngxa06.phx.gbl
| Xref: cpmsftngxa06.phx.gbl microsoft.public.biztalk.appintegration:6333
| NNTP-Posting-Host: tk2msftcmty1.phx.gbl 10.40.1.180
| X-Tomcat-NG: microsoft.public.biztalk.appintegration
|
| After installing the released version of BT 2004 I now get this message
"Some promoted properties may be invalid. " when trying to close the "show
promotions" dialog box. The schema was created with the beta and EAP
versions. The released version seems to run my solution just fine however.
If I remove the promotion for the distinguished fields that the message
complains about, it will not let me promote them again.
What I have noticed is that the fields it will not allow promotions for are
defined as records. This wasn't an issue in the earlier versions.
any ideas ?
Thanks!
Tim
|
| |
|
| Larry,
I'd rather not post it to the group, its quite large for one thing. Is t
here another way I can get it to you ?
Tim
""larry franks"" <larryfr@online.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:MOqdvTQEEHA.1988@cpmsftngxa06.phx.gbl...
> Hi Tim, would you be able to post the schema you are having problems with?
>
> Larry Franks
>
> This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties,and confers no rights.
> Subscribe at
>
http://support.microsoft.com/defaul...msdn/nospam.asp
> &SD=msdn
> --------------------
> | Thread-Topic: bt 2004 distinguished fields
> | thread-index: AcQQPqS9tm/w2naXRcS/houJ4jQ7Yw==
> | X-Tomcat-NG: microsoft.public.biztalk.appintegration
> | From: "=?Utf-8?B?VGltIEI=?=" <TimBur@seattletimes.com>
> | Subject: bt 2004 distinguished fields
> | Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2004 10:51:11 -0800
> | Lines: 15
> | Message-ID: <B218D409-1EB3-4C70-A2BC-3A085425DD00@microsoft.com>
> | MIME-Version: 1.0
> | Content-Type: text/plain;
> | charset="Utf-8"
> | Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
> | X-Newsreader: Microsoft CDO for Windows 2000
> | Content-Class: urn:content-classes:message
> | Importance: normal
> | Priority: normal
> | X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.3790.0
> | Newsgroups: microsoft.public.biztalk.appintegration
> | Path: cpmsftngxa06.phx.gbl
> | Xref: cpmsftngxa06.phx.gbl microsoft.public.biztalk.appintegration:6333
> | NNTP-Posting-Host: tk2msftcmty1.phx.gbl 10.40.1.180
> | X-Tomcat-NG: microsoft.public.biztalk.appintegration
> |
> | After installing the released version of BT 2004 I now get this message
> "Some promoted properties may be invalid. " when trying to close the "show
> promotions" dialog box. The schema was created with the beta and EAP
> versions. The released version seems to run my solution just fine
however.
>
> If I remove the promotion for the distinguished fields that the message
> complains about, it will not let me promote them again.
> What I have noticed is that the fields it will not allow promotions for
are
> defined as records. This wasn't an issue in the earlier versions.
>
> any ideas ?
>
> Thanks!
> Tim
>
> |
>
| |
| larry franks 2004-03-25, 10:38 am |
| Sure, just mail it to me. Just remove the online from the e-mail above.
We'll keep discussion in the newsgroup however. I'll try to avoid
mentioning specifics about the schema if you wish.
Larry Franks
This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties,and confers no rights.
Subscribe at
http://support.microsoft.com/defaul...msdn/nospam.asp
&SD=msdn
--------------------
| From: "Tim B" <TimBur@seattletimes.com>
| References: <B218D409-1EB3-4C70-A2BC-3A085425DD00@microsoft.com>
<MOqdvTQEEHA.1988@cpmsftngxa06.phx.gbl>
| Subject: Re: bt 2004 distinguished fields
| Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2004 15:09:48 -0800
| Lines: 65
| X-Priority: 3
| X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
| X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1158
| X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165
| Message-ID: <eK7deUfEEHA.688@tk2msftngp13.phx.gbl>
| Newsgroups: microsoft.public.biztalk.appintegration
| NNTP-Posting-Host: collective.seatimes.com 192.251.219.11
| Path:
cpmsftngxa06.phx.gbl!TK2MSFTNGXA01.phx.gbl!TK2MSFTNGP08.phx.gbl!tk2msftngp13
.phx.gbl
| Xref: cpmsftngxa06.phx.gbl microsoft.public.biztalk.appintegration:6348
| X-Tomcat-NG: microsoft.public.biztalk.appintegration
|
| Larry,
|
| I'd rather not post it to the group, its quite large for one thing. Is t
| here another way I can get it to you ?
|
| Tim
|
|
|
| ""larry franks"" <larryfr@online.microsoft.com> wrote in message
| news:MOqdvTQEEHA.1988@cpmsftngxa06.phx.gbl...
| > Hi Tim, would you be able to post the schema you are having problems
with?
| >
| > Larry Franks
| >
| > This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties,and confers no
rights.
| > Subscribe at
| >
|
http://support.microsoft.com/defaul...msdn/nospam.asp
| > &SD=msdn
| > --------------------
| > | Thread-Topic: bt 2004 distinguished fields
| > | thread-index: AcQQPqS9tm/w2naXRcS/houJ4jQ7Yw==
| > | X-Tomcat-NG: microsoft.public.biztalk.appintegration
| > | From: "=?Utf-8?B?VGltIEI=?=" <TimBur@seattletimes.com>
| > | Subject: bt 2004 distinguished fields
| > | Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2004 10:51:11 -0800
| > | Lines: 15
| > | Message-ID: <B218D409-1EB3-4C70-A2BC-3A085425DD00@microsoft.com>
| > | MIME-Version: 1.0
| > | Content-Type: text/plain;
| > | charset="Utf-8"
| > | Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
| > | X-Newsreader: Microsoft CDO for Windows 2000
| > | Content-Class: urn:content-classes:message
| > | Importance: normal
| > | Priority: normal
| > | X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.3790.0
| > | Newsgroups: microsoft.public.biztalk.appintegration
| > | Path: cpmsftngxa06.phx.gbl
| > | Xref: cpmsftngxa06.phx.gbl
microsoft.public.biztalk.appintegration:6333
| > | NNTP-Posting-Host: tk2msftcmty1.phx.gbl 10.40.1.180
| > | X-Tomcat-NG: microsoft.public.biztalk.appintegration
| > |
| > | After installing the released version of BT 2004 I now get this
message
| > "Some promoted properties may be invalid. " when trying to close the
"show
| > promotions" dialog box. The schema was created with the beta and EAP
| > versions. The released version seems to run my solution just fine
| however.
| >
| > If I remove the promotion for the distinguished fields that the message
| > complains about, it will not let me promote them again.
| > What I have noticed is that the fields it will not allow promotions for
| are
| > defined as records. This wasn't an issue in the earlier versions.
| >
| > any ideas ?
| >
| > Thanks!
| > Tim
| >
| > |
| >
|
|
|
| |
| larry franks 2004-03-26, 12:31 pm |
| Just an update Tim, I received the files and have been able to reproduce
the issue. I'll see what I can find on this.
Larry Franks
This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties,and confers no rights.
Subscribe at
http://support.microsoft.com/defaul...msdn/nospam.asp
&SD=msdn
--------------------
| X-Tomcat-ID: 420353101
| References: <B218D409-1EB3-4C70-A2BC-3A085425DD00@microsoft.com>
<MOqdvTQEEHA.1988@cpmsftngxa06.phx.gbl>
<eK7deUfEEHA.688@tk2msftngp13.phx.gbl>
| MIME-Version: 1.0
| Content-Type: text/plain
| Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
| From: larryfr@online.microsoft.com ("larry franks")
| Organization: Microsoft
| Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2004 14:58:28 GMT
| Subject: Re: bt 2004 distinguished fields
| X-Tomcat-NG: microsoft.public.biztalk.appintegration
| Message-ID: <nPpsnmnEEHA.1996@cpmsftngxa06.phx.gbl>
| Newsgroups: microsoft.public.biztalk.appintegration
| Lines: 90
| Path: cpmsftngxa06.phx.gbl
| Xref: cpmsftngxa06.phx.gbl microsoft.public.biztalk.appintegration:6350
| NNTP-Posting-Host: TOMCATIMPORT1 10.201.218.122
|
| Sure, just mail it to me. Just remove the online from the e-mail above.
| We'll keep discussion in the newsgroup however. I'll try to avoid
| mentioning specifics about the schema if you wish.
|
| Larry Franks
|
| This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties,and confers no
rights.
| Subscribe at
|
http://support.microsoft.com/defaul...msdn/nospam.asp
| &SD=msdn
| --------------------
| | From: "Tim B" <TimBur@seattletimes.com>
| | References: <B218D409-1EB3-4C70-A2BC-3A085425DD00@microsoft.com>
| <MOqdvTQEEHA.1988@cpmsftngxa06.phx.gbl>
| | Subject: Re: bt 2004 distinguished fields
| | Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2004 15:09:48 -0800
| | Lines: 65
| | X-Priority: 3
| | X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
| | X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1158
| | X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165
| | Message-ID: <eK7deUfEEHA.688@tk2msftngp13.phx.gbl>
| | Newsgroups: microsoft.public.biztalk.appintegration
| | NNTP-Posting-Host: collective.seatimes.com 192.251.219.11
| | Path:
|
cpmsftngxa06.phx.gbl!TK2MSFTNGXA01.phx.gbl!TK2MSFTNGP08.phx.gbl!tk2msftngp13
| .phx.gbl
| | Xref: cpmsftngxa06.phx.gbl microsoft.public.biztalk.appintegration:6348
| | X-Tomcat-NG: microsoft.public.biztalk.appintegration
| |
| | Larry,
| |
| | I'd rather not post it to the group, its quite large for one thing. Is
t
| | here another way I can get it to you ?
| |
| | Tim
| |
| |
| |
| | ""larry franks"" <larryfr@online.microsoft.com> wrote in message
| | news:MOqdvTQEEHA.1988@cpmsftngxa06.phx.gbl...
| | > Hi Tim, would you be able to post the schema you are having problems
| with?
| | >
| | > Larry Franks
| | >
| | > This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties,and confers no
| rights.
| | > Subscribe at
| | >
| |
|
http://support.microsoft.com/defaul...msdn/nospam.asp
| | > &SD=msdn
| | > --------------------
| | > | Thread-Topic: bt 2004 distinguished fields
| | > | thread-index: AcQQPqS9tm/w2naXRcS/houJ4jQ7Yw==
| | > | X-Tomcat-NG: microsoft.public.biztalk.appintegration
| | > | From: "=?Utf-8?B?VGltIEI=?=" <TimBur@seattletimes.com>
| | > | Subject: bt 2004 distinguished fields
| | > | Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2004 10:51:11 -0800
| | > | Lines: 15
| | > | Message-ID: <B218D409-1EB3-4C70-A2BC-3A085425DD00@microsoft.com>
| | > | MIME-Version: 1.0
| | > | Content-Type: text/plain;
| | > | charset="Utf-8"
| | > | Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
| | > | X-Newsreader: Microsoft CDO for Windows 2000
| | > | Content-Class: urn:content-classes:message
| | > | Importance: normal
| | > | Priority: normal
| | > | X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.3790.0
| | > | Newsgroups: microsoft.public.biztalk.appintegration
| | > | Path: cpmsftngxa06.phx.gbl
| | > | Xref: cpmsftngxa06.phx.gbl
| microsoft.public.biztalk.appintegration:6333
| | > | NNTP-Posting-Host: tk2msftcmty1.phx.gbl 10.40.1.180
| | > | X-Tomcat-NG: microsoft.public.biztalk.appintegration
| | > |
| | > | After installing the released version of BT 2004 I now get this
| message
| | > "Some promoted properties may be invalid. " when trying to close the
| "show
| | > promotions" dialog box. The schema was created with the beta and EAP
| | > versions. The released version seems to run my solution just fine
| | however.
| | >
| | > If I remove the promotion for the distinguished fields that the
message
| | > complains about, it will not let me promote them again.
| | > What I have noticed is that the fields it will not allow promotions
for
| | are
| | > defined as records. This wasn't an issue in the earlier versions.
| | >
| | > any ideas ?
| | >
| | > Thanks!
| | > Tim
| | >
| | > |
| | >
| |
| |
| |
|
|
| |
| larry franks 2004-03-26, 12:31 pm |
| Ok Tim, figured it out. I'm not certain how this behavior worked during
beta as I did not work much with the beta versions of the product, but for
the RTM version you cannot promote record nodes as distinguished fields.
Records (with simple content) can be promoted to a property field though.
There is a section in the updated documentation (not released yet
unfortunately, I believe Apr 2 is the date,) that talks about this. There
is a note that record nodes can never be promoted as distinguished fields.
Larry Franks
This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties,and confers no rights.
Subscribe at
http://support.microsoft.com/defaul...msdn/nospam.asp
&SD=msdn
--------------------
| From: "Tim B" <TimBur@seattletimes.com>
| References: <B218D409-1EB3-4C70-A2BC-3A085425DD00@microsoft.com>
<MOqdvTQEEHA.1988@cpmsftngxa06.phx.gbl>
| Subject: Re: bt 2004 distinguished fields
| Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2004 15:09:48 -0800
| Lines: 65
| X-Priority: 3
| X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
| X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1158
| X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165
| Message-ID: <eK7deUfEEHA.688@tk2msftngp13.phx.gbl>
| Newsgroups: microsoft.public.biztalk.appintegration
| NNTP-Posting-Host: collective.seatimes.com 192.251.219.11
| Path:
cpmsftngxa06.phx.gbl!TK2MSFTNGXA01.phx.gbl!TK2MSFTNGP08.phx.gbl!tk2msftngp13
.phx.gbl
| Xref: cpmsftngxa06.phx.gbl microsoft.public.biztalk.appintegration:6348
| X-Tomcat-NG: microsoft.public.biztalk.appintegration
|
| Larry,
|
| I'd rather not post it to the group, its quite large for one thing. Is t
| here another way I can get it to you ?
|
| Tim
|
|
|
| ""larry franks"" <larryfr@online.microsoft.com> wrote in message
| news:MOqdvTQEEHA.1988@cpmsftngxa06.phx.gbl...
| > Hi Tim, would you be able to post the schema you are having problems
with?
| >
| > Larry Franks
| >
| > This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties,and confers no
rights.
| > Subscribe at
| >
|
http://support.microsoft.com/defaul...msdn/nospam.asp
| > &SD=msdn
| > --------------------
| > | Thread-Topic: bt 2004 distinguished fields
| > | thread-index: AcQQPqS9tm/w2naXRcS/houJ4jQ7Yw==
| > | X-Tomcat-NG: microsoft.public.biztalk.appintegration
| > | From: "=?Utf-8?B?VGltIEI=?=" <TimBur@seattletimes.com>
| > | Subject: bt 2004 distinguished fields
| > | Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2004 10:51:11 -0800
| > | Lines: 15
| > | Message-ID: <B218D409-1EB3-4C70-A2BC-3A085425DD00@microsoft.com>
| > | MIME-Version: 1.0
| > | Content-Type: text/plain;
| > | charset="Utf-8"
| > | Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
| > | X-Newsreader: Microsoft CDO for Windows 2000
| > | Content-Class: urn:content-classes:message
| > | Importance: normal
| > | Priority: normal
| > | X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.3790.0
| > | Newsgroups: microsoft.public.biztalk.appintegration
| > | Path: cpmsftngxa06.phx.gbl
| > | Xref: cpmsftngxa06.phx.gbl
microsoft.public.biztalk.appintegration:6333
| > | NNTP-Posting-Host: tk2msftcmty1.phx.gbl 10.40.1.180
| > | X-Tomcat-NG: microsoft.public.biztalk.appintegration
| > |
| > | After installing the released version of BT 2004 I now get this
message
| > "Some promoted properties may be invalid. " when trying to close the
"show
| > promotions" dialog box. The schema was created with the beta and EAP
| > versions. The released version seems to run my solution just fine
| however.
| >
| > If I remove the promotion for the distinguished fields that the message
| > complains about, it will not let me promote them again.
| > What I have noticed is that the fields it will not allow promotions for
| are
| > defined as records. This wasn't an issue in the earlier versions.
| >
| > any ideas ?
| >
| > Thanks!
| > Tim
| >
| > |
| >
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|