BizTalk Server Applications Integration - IDoc schema generation problem

This is Interesting: Free IT Magazines  
Home > Archive > BizTalk Server Applications Integration > February 2005 > IDoc schema generation problem





You are viewing an archived Text-only version of the thread. To view this thread in it's original format and/or if you want to reply to this thread please [click here]

Author IDoc schema generation problem
Wesley

2004-12-28, 7:49 am

Hi,

I tried to generate the person idoc schema with
the BizTalk Adapter v2.0 for mySAP Business Suite Schema
Generation Wizard.
I got the following error message:
The schema generation encountered the following error(s):
1. Error occured while generating schema for :WP_PER01
Error returned : SEGMENT_UNKNOWN

I tested it in two different SAP environments. The
enviroment versions are (That's what the wizard told me) :
- Version 3, Release 46C
- Version 3, Release 620

I have generated successfully other schemas. Only the
person schema is the problem, so far.

Any ideas what is wrong ?

Regards,
Wesley

Patrick Wagner

2005-02-10, 7:50 am

Hello Wesley,

when we have this problem, we were contacting the Developer of the SAP Idoc
and explaining him, that he has to "get free" all of the segments, which will
be used in this Idoc.

In German it's called "deallocate" or "release". I am not sure what it is
called in english in the SAP context.

In SAP you can check this with the transacions: we31 or we60.

Good luck and best regards
Patrick


"Wesley" wrote:

> Hi,
>
> I tried to generate the person idoc schema with
> the BizTalk Adapter v2.0 for mySAP Business Suite Schema
> Generation Wizard.
> I got the following error message:
> The schema generation encountered the following error(s):
> 1. Error occured while generating schema for :WP_PER01
> Error returned : SEGMENT_UNKNOWN
>
> I tested it in two different SAP environments. The
> enviroment versions are (That's what the wizard told me) :
> - Version 3, Release 46C
> - Version 3, Release 620
>
> I have generated successfully other schemas. Only the
> person schema is the problem, so far.
>
> Any ideas what is wrong ?
>
> Regards,
> Wesley
>
>

Sponsored Links






Free braindumps | Software forum | Database administration forum

Copyright 2003 - 2008 webservertalk.com