| Lars W. Andersen 2004-11-10, 5:48 pm |
| Hi Jeanette,
not really ... have been knee-deep in all sorts of other project troubles
and i am waiting to test it on some real hardware.
On my virtual PC development environment it looked promising, but harddrive
read/write is a bottleneck now. But it stops the constant
dehydration/rehydration, and seems to lower CPU usage. But actual message
throughput did not improve in an ordered delivery orchestration. Its still
down around one a second at the max.
But thats all just on my virtual machine - I hope to get time to test it
tomorrow on real HW.
What exactly is your results? CPU usage, dehydration/rehydration, message
throughputs, etc etc.
regards
Lars
"jss" <jss@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:CC337D34-D12A-4626-BCB3-8BB2F3D3F535@microsoft.com...[vbcol=seagreen]
> Hi Lars,
> Any progress on this issue after the hot fix? We are not seeing any
> noticeable change in performance.
>
> Jeannette
>
>
> "Lars W. Andersen" wrote:
>
this[vbcol=seagreen]
However,[vbcol=seagreen]
persistence[vbcol=seagreen]
also[vbcol=seagreen]
were[vbcol=seagreen]
we[vbcol=seagreen]
I[vbcol=seagreen]
like[vbcol=seagreen]
have[vbcol=seagreen]
and[vbcol=seagreen]
notification =[vbcol=seagreen]
your[vbcol=seagreen]
time[vbcol=seagreen]
I[vbcol=seagreen]
and[vbcol=seagreen]
MsgBox[vbcol=seagreen]
connect[vbcol=seagreen]
in[vbcol=seagreen]
news:D8FFBF1E-0B49-4BC4-BC1B-B75229215E6D@microsoft.com...[vbcol=seagreen]
does[vbcol=seagreen]
you[vbcol=seagreen]
This[vbcol=seagreen]
and[vbcol=seagreen]
track[vbcol=seagreen]
effect,[vbcol=seagreen]
orchestration[vbcol=seagreen]
messages[vbcol=seagreen]
of[vbcol=seagreen]
me a[vbcol=seagreen]
Aggregator[vbcol=seagreen]
wrote[vbcol=seagreen]
active[vbcol=seagreen]
test[vbcol=seagreen]
It[vbcol=seagreen]
out[vbcol=seagreen]
Long[vbcol=seagreen]
set[vbcol=seagreen]
the MQ[vbcol=seagreen]
|