|
Home > Archive > BizTalk Server Orchestration > November 2004 > Indipendent communication between orchestration
You are viewing an archived Text-only version of the thread.
To view this thread in it's original format and/or if you want to reply to
this thread please [click here]
| Author |
Indipendent communication between orchestration
|
|
| Gionni 2004-11-15, 7:46 am |
| Hello everyone,
this is my scenario. I have an orchestration Manager and other
orchestrations Workers that make some job. My intention would be to
keep the Manager always alive, waiting for a message from the Workers
about their execution. I would like the Worker sends a message to the
Manager without any correlations. Both orchestrations starts
independently.
Is possible to simply send a message in this way?
Another little question. Can I get some information about the picked
file? I'm interested in name and size particulary.
Thanks all,
Gionni
| |
| Nabeel Prior 2004-11-16, 7:46 am |
| Hi,
The only way I know of that you can get messages from one
orchestration to another is via the Call Orchestration or Start
Orchestration shapes. As far as I am aware, however, in what you are
wanting to do this would start new instances of your orchestration,
and not interact with existing orchestrations.
In terms of the file info - you can get the file name from the FILE.
ReceivedFileName property on the message. Not sure where the size
can be obtained from.
Kind Regards,
Nabeel Prior
http://www.brainjar.co.za
Blog: http://www.brainjar.co.za/blog.aspx
2004/11/15 14:31:19
Gionni <ehigionni@katamail.com> wrote in message
<d96ed82b.0411150431.66fcb1ea@posting.google.com>
> Hello everyone,
> this is my scenario. I have an orchestration Manager and other
> orchestrations Workers that make some job. My intention would be to
> keep the Manager always alive, waiting for a message from the
Workers
> about their execution. I would like the Worker sends a message to
the
> Manager without any correlations. Both orchestrations starts
> independently.
> Is possible to simply send a message in this way?
>
> Another little question. Can I get some information about the
picked
> file? I'm interested in name and size particulary.
>
> Thanks all,
> Gionni
| |
| Matt Milner 2004-11-16, 8:47 pm |
| In order to direct messages to an already running orchestration, you must
use correlation or there is no way to tie your message back to that running
instance.
Matt
"Gionni" <ehigionni@katamail.com> wrote in message
news:d96ed82b.0411150431.66fcb1ea@posting.google.com...
> Hello everyone,
> this is my scenario. I have an orchestration Manager and other
> orchestrations Workers that make some job. My intention would be to
> keep the Manager always alive, waiting for a message from the Workers
> about their execution. I would like the Worker sends a message to the
> Manager without any correlations. Both orchestrations starts
> independently.
> Is possible to simply send a message in this way?
>
> Another little question. Can I get some information about the picked
> file? I'm interested in name and size particulary.
>
> Thanks all,
> Gionni
|
|
|
|
|