| Author |
Orchestration Deployment
|
|
|
| Hi ,
I have a component which is kind of wrapper over the
deployment+Bind+Enlist+Start tasks into a single task.
Now i have a need of performing all these tasks as an atomic one that is if
i dont perform even one of these i should not perform any ..
How should i go about doing this .any help is highly appreciated.
Rgds
| |
| Grifter 2004-04-07, 9:02 am |
| Make your component as a serviced one.
"sudha" <sudhavn@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:uTjqKvGHEHA.712@tk2msftngp13.phx.gbl...
> Hi ,
> I have a component which is kind of wrapper over the
> deployment+Bind+Enlist+Start tasks into a single task.
> Now i have a need of performing all these tasks as an atomic one that is
if
> i dont perform even one of these i should not perform any ..
> How should i go about doing this .any help is highly appreciated.
>
> Rgds
>
>
| |
| Christof 2004-04-07, 2:05 pm |
| Grifter,
did you actually try this? I know this is true but never saw anyone do this
in real life. Do you have a sample you can share with the community?
Regards!
Christof
"Grifter" <grifter@thisisafakeword.hotmail.topreventspam.com> wrote in
message news:%23PW8XqJHEHA.2844@tk2msftngp13.phx.gbl...
> Make your component as a serviced one.
>
> "sudha" <sudhavn@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> news:uTjqKvGHEHA.712@tk2msftngp13.phx.gbl...
> if
>
>
| |
| Grifter 2004-04-07, 2:54 pm |
| Yes, I did try long ago with Beta. It was just a test. I'm sorry, I dont
have the code on hand to share.
But It worked as it was expected !
"Christof" <bts2004communityfeedback (at) hotmail (dot) com> wrote in
message news:OdmQ8PMHEHA.2928@TK2MSFTNGP10.phx.gbl...
> Grifter,
>
> did you actually try this? I know this is true but never saw anyone do
this
> in real life. Do you have a sample you can share with the community?
>
> Regards!
> Christof
>
> "Grifter" <grifter@thisisafakeword.hotmail.topreventspam.com> wrote in
> message news:%23PW8XqJHEHA.2844@tk2msftngp13.phx.gbl...
is[color=darkred]
>
>
| |
|
| Willl it undeploy itself?????only by making it a serviced component or do i
need to compensate these actions on catch of any exception??
"Grifter" <Grifter@thisisafakeword.hotmail.topreventspam.com> wrote in
message news:OlyqP1MHEHA.712@tk2msftngp13.phx.gbl...
> Yes, I did try long ago with Beta. It was just a test. I'm sorry, I dont
> have the code on hand to share.
> But It worked as it was expected !
>
> "Christof" <bts2004communityfeedback (at) hotmail (dot) com> wrote in
> message news:OdmQ8PMHEHA.2928@TK2MSFTNGP10.phx.gbl...
> this
that[color=darkred]
> is
>
>
| |
| Christof 2004-04-11, 4:29 pm |
| The service component makes this a real transaction to the SQL Server!
"suraj" <suraj@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:uwpn2NXHEHA.2556@TK2MSFTNGP12.phx.gbl...
> Willl it undeploy itself?????only by making it a serviced component or do
i
> need to compensate these actions on catch of any exception??
>
> "Grifter" <Grifter@thisisafakeword.hotmail.topreventspam.com> wrote in
> message news:OlyqP1MHEHA.712@tk2msftngp13.phx.gbl...
do[color=darkred]
> that
>
>
| |
| suraj 2004-04-18, 10:53 am |
| Hi christof,
I could get my component ready and made it a serviced component and also
set the [Autocomplete] attribute to the method which does
"deploys+binds+enlist+start" on an orchestration but as you said its not
working that way
i created a problem so that it doesnt enlist but then the transaction
couldnt stop it from getting deployed
Any idea if something is wrong here?
Rgds
"Christof" <bts2004communityfeedback (at) hotmail (dot) com> wrote in
message news:u2fTVyiHEHA.1048@TK2MSFTNGP12.phx.gbl...
> The service component makes this a real transaction to the SQL Server!
>
> "suraj" <suraj@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> news:uwpn2NXHEHA.2556@TK2MSFTNGP12.phx.gbl...
do[vbcol=seagreen]
> i
dont[vbcol=seagreen]
> do
community?[vbcol=seagreen]
in[vbcol=seagreen]
appreciated.[vbcol=seagreen]
>
>
| |
| Christof 2004-04-18, 10:53 am |
| Can you try to just throw an exception somewhere in the method call please?
Check the DTC to ensure it rolls back...
Thanks,
Christof
"suraj" <suraj@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:eLv0CTEJEHA.2680@TK2MSFTNGP11.phx.gbl...
> Hi christof,
> I could get my component ready and made it a serviced component and
also
> set the [Autocomplete] attribute to the method which does
> "deploys+binds+enlist+start" on an orchestration but as you said its not
> working that way
> i created a problem so that it doesnt enlist but then the transaction
> couldnt stop it from getting deployed
> Any idea if something is wrong here?
>
> Rgds
>
>
>
>
>
> "Christof" <bts2004communityfeedback (at) hotmail (dot) com> wrote in
> message news:u2fTVyiHEHA.1048@TK2MSFTNGP12.phx.gbl...
> do
> dont
in[vbcol=seagreen]
anyone[vbcol=seagreen]
> community?
wrote[vbcol=seagreen]
> in
one[vbcol=seagreen]
> appreciated.
>
>
| |
| Christof 2004-04-18, 10:53 am |
| Hey guys,
If you think this is important enough, can we do a little msn session on
this one perhaps?
Please let me know.
Regards,
Christof
"Christof" <bts2004communityfeedback (at) hotmail (dot) com> wrote in
message news:u3q9TWHJEHA.1740@tk2msftngp13.phx.gbl...
> Can you try to just throw an exception somewhere in the method call
please?
> Check the DTC to ensure it rolls back...
>
> Thanks,
> Christof
>
> "suraj" <suraj@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> news:eLv0CTEJEHA.2680@TK2MSFTNGP11.phx.gbl...
> also
or[vbcol=seagreen]
in[vbcol=seagreen]
I[vbcol=seagreen]
> in
> anyone
> wrote
> one
>
>
| |
| sudha 2004-04-18, 10:53 am |
| yes that would help!!
"Christof" <bts2004communityfeedback (at) hotmail (dot) com> wrote in
message news:#Du88qIJEHA.2576@TK2MSFTNGP12.phx.gbl...
> Hey guys,
>
> If you think this is important enough, can we do a little msn session on
> this one perhaps?
> Please let me know.
>
> Regards,
> Christof
>
> "Christof" <bts2004communityfeedback (at) hotmail (dot) com> wrote in
> message news:u3q9TWHJEHA.1740@tk2msftngp13.phx.gbl...
> please?
not[vbcol=seagreen]
Server![vbcol=seagreen]
component[vbcol=seagreen]
> or
wrote[vbcol=seagreen]
> in
sorry,[vbcol=seagreen]
> I
wrote[vbcol=seagreen]
atomic[vbcol=seagreen]
...[vbcol=seagreen]
>
>
| |
| Christof 2004-04-18, 10:53 am |
| Ok,
could you please reply to me personally, then we can setup something. (Live
in Belgium so we'll have to figure out some time-zone constraints... :-) )
Best regards,
Christof
"sudha" <sudhavn@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:O1ZM0oPJEHA.1220@TK2MSFTNGP11.phx.gbl...
> yes that would help!!
>
> "Christof" <bts2004communityfeedback (at) hotmail (dot) com> wrote in
> message news:#Du88qIJEHA.2576@TK2MSFTNGP12.phx.gbl...
and[vbcol=seagreen]
> not
transaction[vbcol=seagreen]
in[vbcol=seagreen]
> Server!
> component
> wrote
> sorry,
> wrote
saw[vbcol=seagreen]
<grifter@thisisafakeword.hotmail.topreventspam.com>[vbcol=seagreen]
> atomic
any[vbcol=seagreen]
> ..
>
>
| |
| Christof 2004-04-19, 3:37 am |
| Grifter,
did you use the explorer object model or WMI please? I took a look at
Sudha's code which seems fine to me at first sight. I'll be doing some more
tests later on. Just need to know what you exactly did please. Thanks for
sharing.
Bests regards,
Christof
"Grifter" <grifter@thisisafakeword.hotmail.topreventspam.com> wrote in
message news:%23PW8XqJHEHA.2844@tk2msftngp13.phx.gbl...
> Make your component as a serviced one.
>
> "sudha" <sudhavn@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> news:uTjqKvGHEHA.712@tk2msftngp13.phx.gbl...
> if
>
>
| |
| Rohith 2004-04-26, 1:14 am |
| Is this process working???/
Any Help are Document would be gr8ly appreciated!!
Thanks
CR-
quote:
Originally posted by sudha
yes that would help!!
"Christof" <bts2004communityfeedback (at) hotmail (dot) com> wrote in
message news:#Du88qIJEHA.2576@TK2MSFTNGP12.phx.gbl...
> Hey guys,
>
> If you think this is important enough, can we do a little msn session on
> this one perhaps?
> Please let me know.
>
> Regards,
> Christof
>
> "Christof" <bts2004communityfeedback (at) hotmail (dot) com> wrote in
> message news:u3q9TWHJEHA.1740@tk2msftngp13.phx.gbl...
> please?
not[vbcol=seagreen]
Server![vbcol=seagreen]
component[vbcol=seagreen]
> or
wrote[vbcol=seagreen]
> in
sorry,[vbcol=seagreen]
> I
wrote[vbcol=seagreen]
atomic[vbcol=seagreen]
....[vbcol=seagreen]
>
>
| |
| Rohith 2004-04-26, 1:29 am |
| Hi Christof,
I am trying to drop 10 files in receive folder, and i am expecting each file pickup and drop after certain delay time!!
what i did is:
i created correlation on BTS.ReceivePortName and in the orchastration i created first receive port on intialize correlation,second one with in the loop follwing corrlation and a delay process finaly send port.
Still it is picking up all files at a time!!
Anybody help me out any Orchastratin diagrame are any sugestions would be gr8ly appreciated!!
Anybody having Orchastration diagram send me a copy to me emailid:cr_rohith@yahoo.com.
It is really urgent for me!!
Thanku for your time!!
CR-
quote:
Originally posted by Christof
Grifter,
did you actually try this? I know this is true but never saw anyone do this
in real life. Do you have a sample you can share with the community?
Regards!
Christof
"Grifter" <grifter@thisisafakeword.hotmail.topreventspam.com> wrote in
message news:%23PW8XqJHEHA.2844@tk2msftngp13.phx.gbl...
> Make your component as a serviced one.
>
> "sudha" <sudhavn@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> news:uTjqKvGHEHA.712@tk2msftngp13.phx.gbl...
> if
>
>
| |
| Christof 2004-04-26, 7:35 am |
| Hi,
you are using a convoy right? (Which, for a sequential one, is same as
having an initialise rcv and loop with contained in it a following rcv on
same correlation set.)
The behaviour you see is normal! The FILE adapter (like any other adapter)
is not aware of that convoy. It picks up all messages it finds in a single
location and drops them into the message box. The MBox is responsible for
routing/queueing those to deliver them to your orchestration. This means:
the files will be picked up immediately but the processing is delayed and
determined by your orchestrations convoy construct.
What is the reason that you absolutely want it to *stop* picking up files
until a certain delay passed please? I'm sure there's a way to achieve your
end goals, so it would help if you explained the scenario.
Kindest regards,
Christof
"Rohith" <Rohith.15b4mq@mail.webservertalk.com> wrote in message
news:Rohith.15b4mq@mail.webservertalk.com...
>
> Hi Christof,
>
> I am trying to drop 10 files in receive folder, and i am expecting each
> file pickup and drop after certain delay time!!
>
> what i did is:
>
> i created correlation on BTS.ReceivePortName and in the orchastration
> i created first receive port on intialize correlation,second one with
> in the loop follwing corrlation and a delay process finaly send port.
>
> Still it is picking up all files at a time!!
>
> Anybody help me out any Orchastratin diagrame are any sugestions would
> be gr8ly appreciated!!
>
> Anybody having Orchastration diagram send me a copy to me
> emailid:cr_rohith@yahoo.com.
>
> It is really urgent for me!!
>
> Thanku for your time!!
>
> CR-
>
> Christof wrote:
>
>
>
> --
> Rohith
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Posted via http://www.webservertalk.com
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> View this thread: http://www.webservertalk.com/message174517.html
>
| |
| Rohith 2004-04-26, 10:22 pm |
| That't fine with me, to pickup at a time and drop according to
Delay!!
I am working on Sequential Convoy Correlation!!!
Here this it working!!
Rcv port pickingup all files and droping at destination folder as i mentined in delay(30 sec) and loop timeout(1 min).
I am getting files every 30 sec on my destnation folder!!
it is working when i included %datetime% insted of %MessageID%.
But the problem is:
when i drop 3 files in the pickup location!!
At destnation i am receving files every 30 seconds more then 3 o/p?? like 5 to 6 o/p every 30sec.
what might be wrong!! i am not getting????/
any sugetions would be gr8ly appreciated!!
CR-
quote:
Originally posted by Christof
Hi,
you are using a convoy right? (Which, for a sequential one, is same as
having an initialise rcv and loop with contained in it a following rcv on
same correlation set.)
The behaviour you see is normal! The FILE adapter (like any other adapter)
is not aware of that convoy. It picks up all messages it finds in a single
location and drops them into the message box. The MBox is responsible for
routing/queueing those to deliver them to your orchestration. This means:
the files will be picked up immediately but the processing is delayed and
determined by your orchestrations convoy construct.
What is the reason that you absolutely want it to *stop* picking up files
until a certain delay passed please? I'm sure there's a way to achieve your
end goals, so it would help if you explained the scenario.
Kindest regards,
Christof
"Rohith" <Rohith.15b4mq@mail.webservertalk.com> wrote in message
news:Rohith.15b4mq@mail.webservertalk.com...
>
> Hi Christof,
>
> I am trying to drop 10 files in receive folder, and i am expecting each
> file pickup and drop after certain delay time!!
>
> what i did is:
>
> i created correlation on BTS.ReceivePortName and in the orchastration
> i created first receive port on intialize correlation,second one with
> in the loop follwing corrlation and a delay process finaly send port.
>
> Still it is picking up all files at a time!!
>
> Anybody help me out any Orchastratin diagrame are any sugestions would
> be gr8ly appreciated!!
>
> Anybody having Orchastration diagram send me a copy to me
> emailid:cr_rohith@yahoo.com.
>
> It is really urgent for me!!
>
> Thanku for your time!!
>
> CR-
>
> Christof wrote:
>
>
>
> --
> Rohith
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Posted via http://www.webservertalk.com
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> View this thread: http://www.webservertalk.com/message174517.html
>
|
|
|
|