|
Home > Archive > BizTalk Server Orchestration > July 2004 > Envelope Processing in BTS2K4
You are viewing an archived Text-only version of the thread.
To view this thread in it's original format and/or if you want to reply to
this thread please [click here]
| Author |
Envelope Processing in BTS2K4
|
|
|
| I am receiving a CSV file from Excel.
I wish to strip the header line from the body and that is done in the Envelope Processing component.
I looked at the SDK example, but two problems occurred:
1. I can not see any reference to the envelope schema, except in the project file of course. How does the pipeline know about the envelope? Is it some magical internal recognition that takes place or is it a reference that has to be set somewhere?
2. The Microsoft example in the SDK does not work. I tried testing it in order to track the settings, but the example does not work either.
If anyone could shed some light on this, I would greatly appreciate it.
Thanks
C
| |
| gordon 2004-07-22, 2:48 am |
| Not sure why you cannot reference the envelope schema because once it is in the project it can be referenced. Here is a good explanation of what the SDK lacks.
http://weblogs.asp.net/jan/archive/...3/07/85259.aspx
The envelope schema is selected in the new pipeline component. Also when deploying your orchestration the ports you create should reference the new pipelines.
Gordon
"C" wrote:
> I am receiving a CSV file from Excel.
> I wish to strip the header line from the body and that is done in the Envelope Processing component.
> I looked at the SDK example, but two problems occurred:
>
> 1. I can not see any reference to the envelope schema, except in the project file of course. How does the pipeline know about the envelope? Is it some magical internal recognition that takes place or is it a reference that has to be set somewhere?
>
> 2. The Microsoft example in the SDK does not work. I tried testing it in order to track the settings, but the example does not work either.
>
> If anyone could shed some light on this, I would greatly appreciate it.
>
> Thanks
> C
>
|
|
|
|
|