|
Home > Archive > BizTalk Server Orchestration > March 2005 > Multiple Servers and Rehydration
You are viewing an archived Text-only version of the thread.
To view this thread in it's original format and/or if you want to reply to
this thread please [click here]
| Author |
Multiple Servers and Rehydration
|
|
| Neal Walters 2005-03-08, 5:49 pm |
| When a dehydrated orchestration resumes, does it always go back to the server
it was running on originally, or can it start running again on any server?
We have traces in our orchestrations that write to the local machine, and
I'm wondering if the trace files will be split on two machines if we have two
servers in our Biztalk Group?
Neal Walters
http://Biztalk-Training.com
| |
| Yossi Dahan 2005-03-08, 5:49 pm |
| My guess is that it would be picked up by any machine, but might be worth to
get a confirmation.
Yossi Dahan
"Neal Walters" <NealWalters@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:3733E184-2E74-45F0-8B10-70D7685F63B8@microsoft.com...
> When a dehydrated orchestration resumes, does it always go back to the
> server
> it was running on originally, or can it start running again on any server?
>
> We have traces in our orchestrations that write to the local machine, and
> I'm wondering if the trace files will be split on two machines if we have
> two
> servers in our Biztalk Group?
>
> Neal Walters
> http://Biztalk-Training.com
>
>
| |
| Jon Flanders[DevelopMentor] 2005-03-08, 5:49 pm |
| Yes - it can be picked up by any server running that host.
--
Jon Flanders [DevelopMentor]
http://staff.develop.com/jfland/
http://www.develop.com/courses/biztalk
"Yossi Dahan" <yossidahan@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:OwdxyF$IFHA.3376@TK2MSFTNGP14.phx.gbl...
> My guess is that it would be picked up by any machine, but might be worth
> to get a confirmation.
>
> Yossi Dahan
>
> "Neal Walters" <NealWalters@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
> news:3733E184-2E74-45F0-8B10-70D7685F63B8@microsoft.com...
>
>
| |
| Alan Smith 2005-03-09, 7:46 am |
| Hi,
Yes, the orchestration can rehydrate on any BizTalk server in the group on
which the BizTalk host that hosts the orchestration is running on. (This is
great id a BizTalk server dies, but not for your tracing example).
One option may be to create a TracingHost, and create an instance of that
host on only one server. You can then assign the orchestrations you wish to
trace to that host (You could use the BizTalk host for this also, but this
would affect other orchestrations running in the host).
Regards,
Alan
"Neal Walters" wrote:
> When a dehydrated orchestration resumes, does it always go back to the server
> it was running on originally, or can it start running again on any server?
>
> We have traces in our orchestrations that write to the local machine, and
> I'm wondering if the trace files will be split on two machines if we have two
> servers in our Biztalk Group?
>
> Neal Walters
> http://Biztalk-Training.com
>
>
| |
| Saravana Kumar 2005-03-09, 5:50 pm |
| Definitely the re-hydrated orchestration will be picked by any machine in
the group hosting that orchestration.
To confirm listen to Scotts, Architecture webcast.
Cheers,
Saravana
"Jon Flanders[DevelopMentor]" <jfland@develop.com> wrote in message
news:#qK31H$IFHA.1392@TK2MSFTNGP10.phx.gbl...
> Yes - it can be picked up by any server running that host.
>
> --
> Jon Flanders [DevelopMentor]
> http://staff.develop.com/jfland/
> http://www.develop.com/courses/biztalk
> "Yossi Dahan" <yossidahan@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:OwdxyF$IFHA.3376@TK2MSFTNGP14.phx.gbl...
worth[vbcol=seagreen]
and[vbcol=seagreen]
have[vbcol=seagreen]
>
>
| |
| Hugo Rodger-Brown 2005-03-16, 7:51 am |
| We use debugview to watch orchestrations in realtime, in a multimachine
environment, and I'm afraid you do have to watch all of the boxes in the
group. It can become quite confusing.
"Saravana Kumar" <saravana@hotmail.co.uk> wrote in message
news:ux$RooMJFHA.3788@tk2msftngp13.phx.gbl...
> Definitely the re-hydrated orchestration will be picked by any machine in
> the group hosting that orchestration.
>
> To confirm listen to Scotts, Architecture webcast.
>
> Cheers,
> Saravana
> "Jon Flanders[DevelopMentor]" <jfland@develop.com> wrote in message
> news:#qK31H$IFHA.1392@TK2MSFTNGP10.phx.gbl...
> worth
message[vbcol=seagreen]
the[vbcol=seagreen]
> and
> have
>
>
| |
| Scott Colestock 2005-03-16, 5:56 pm |
| You might consider using a tracing facility that allows you to have a
"server consolidated" view of your realtime tracing.
One example of this is to use the log4net API, in conjunction with a Paul
Bunyan appender or perhaps the log4net remoting forwarder.
I've found this to be invaluable for doing this kind of diagnostic work...
See
http://www.traceofthought.net/Perma...a4ff1ba00a.aspx
for a discussion of this.
Scott Colestock
www.traceofthought.net
"Hugo Rodger-Brown" <hugo@coldhams.com> wrote in message
news:umEXqDhKFHA.2136@TK2MSFTNGP14.phx.gbl...
> We use debugview to watch orchestrations in realtime, in a multimachine
> environment, and I'm afraid you do have to watch all of the boxes in the
> group. It can become quite confusing.
>
>
> "Saravana Kumar" <saravana@hotmail.co.uk> wrote in message
> news:ux$RooMJFHA.3788@tk2msftngp13.phx.gbl...
> message
> the
>
>
|
|
|
|
|