|
Home > Archive > BizTalk Server Orchestration > March 2005 > Problems with the consumption of webservices
You are viewing an archived Text-only version of the thread.
To view this thread in it's original format and/or if you want to reply to
this thread please [click here]
| Author |
Problems with the consumption of webservices
|
|
| m.jenschke@compass-ms.de 2005-03-23, 7:47 am |
| Hi Group,
i am trying to connect MBS Axapta to the BizTalk using webservices. I added
the webservice as a webreference and created a map according to the MOC
documents. Prior to the send and receive shapes i have to use the
Create_Request shape filled with a Transformation shape.
The problem I am experiencing lies inside the transfomation shape. Its
possible to select a map I created before, but I cant select the value from
the map.
Whats wrong ?
Sry for my bad english.
Thanks in advance.
Matthias Jenschke
| |
| Scott Colestock 2005-03-23, 6:01 pm |
| The intent of the transformation shape isn't to allow you to pick an
individual value in the destination map, but rather to produce an entire
message based on the output of the transformation. Does that make sense?
Scott Colestock
www.traceofthought.net
<m.jenschke@compass-ms.de> wrote in message
news:OGOr584LFHA.1884@TK2MSFTNGP15.phx.gbl...
> Hi Group,
>
> i am trying to connect MBS Axapta to the BizTalk using webservices. I
> added
> the webservice as a webreference and created a map according to the MOC
> documents. Prior to the send and receive shapes i have to use the
> Create_Request shape filled with a Transformation shape.
> The problem I am experiencing lies inside the transfomation shape. Its
> possible to select a map I created before, but I cant select the value
> from
> the map.
> Whats wrong ?
>
> Sry for my bad english.
> Thanks in advance.
> Matthias Jenschke
| |
| m.jenschke@compass-ms.de 2005-03-29, 2:48 am |
| Sry, it took me so long to answer, I was out of town over the easter days.
That makes sense, but what input does the transformation configuration
expect ?
I understand, that the orchestration works with messages instead of schemas
and that this messages are build / validated through a map file. Accordingly
the trans. - config. should be fine with a map and its inherent schemas.
Thanks for your help
Matthias Jenschke
|
|
|
|
|